Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Elizabeth Edwards 3-pronged plan of revenge against John Edwards
Examiner ^ | 12.28.2010 | Ruth Houston

Posted on 12/28/2010 7:57:41 PM PST by libh8er

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-156 next last
To: HighWheeler

“I thoroughly believe that God reserves a special place in Hell for those who wantonly partake in the destruction of His covenant of marriage.”

No, that was just a novel called “The Inferno”, by Dante.


61 posted on 12/28/2010 8:45:54 PM PST by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Bodleian_Girl
Most men will cheat given the opportunity.

I object. It only appears that way because nobody ever hears about the men who decline the opportunity. The man doesn't want to talk about it because most women will still hold it against them for even thinking about it and the woman doesn't want to talk about it because she would never admit some man refused her overtures.

I'll bet there are thousands of times men get overtures and don't act on them either because of other commitments or they just weren't that interested. But you'll never hear about it because nobody wants to discuss it.

62 posted on 12/28/2010 8:47:06 PM PST by OrangeHoof (Washington, we Texans want a divorce!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom

Pre-nuptial agreement, not known to us proles. It is very likely this is part of a well written amendment, as a “post nup” pre-nup agreement. Joint survivorship in NC. And Edwards is definitely not a fit parent, by definition. Guardianship for the youngest kids, and that by the 28 year old.


63 posted on 12/28/2010 8:47:10 PM PST by John S Mosby (Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: GOPsterinMA

Maiden name: Anania

That should answer your question. LOL


64 posted on 12/28/2010 8:47:45 PM PST by Daisyjane69 (Michael Reagan: "Welcome back, Dad, even if you're wearing a dress and bearing children this time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: libh8er

She can’t tell John not to have his kids all be together, sorry but children are not property.


65 posted on 12/28/2010 8:49:22 PM PST by factmart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2banana

She would probably have some say about half of the assets...but I’m not sure how she could have so very much control. Maybe she got him to sign over some control while he was in the deepest part of his shame/guilt...?


66 posted on 12/28/2010 8:49:28 PM PST by bannie (( ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

I wouldn’t call Rielle “nice”. She is jumped up trailer trash, whose daddy insured horses (like, her horse for instance) and then had them killed for money. Really slimy family in Ocala. And this chickie was a powder monkey, if you get the snow drift.


67 posted on 12/28/2010 8:50:08 PM PST by John S Mosby (Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: HighWheeler
I thoroughly believe that God reserves a special place in Hell for those who wantonly partake in the destruction of His covenant of marriage.

Not if they repent and ask for forgiveness, which, if this article is true, it appears John has. Actually, if you read your Bible, you will discover that God sent His one and only Son to restore that same covenant that Israel broke in a similar (if not more wanton) fashion. But don't let that get in the way of a good rant. /s

68 posted on 12/28/2010 8:50:37 PM PST by naturalized
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Daisyjane69

Sounds Italian. Thanks for the info!


69 posted on 12/28/2010 8:50:42 PM PST by GOPsterinMA (RomneyCare is Mitt`s Chappaquiddick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: SonofReagan

Ahhh an ‘insider’s account’. Does this mean we take the word of those ‘insider’s’ that bad mouthed Sarah Palin, being truthful, too?


70 posted on 12/28/2010 8:50:48 PM PST by Netizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

I agree with your assessment.


71 posted on 12/28/2010 8:51:16 PM PST by secret garden (Why procrastinate when you can perendinate?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Netizen
Such as?

If this article is to believed, we have several great examples of ways she may have tortured him.

What we have here is a picture of how a witch on her deathbed finishes her life of evil.

72 posted on 12/28/2010 8:52:38 PM PST by Balding_Eagle (Overproduction, one of the top five worries of the American Farmer each and every year..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Williams

“negatives are the attempt to use her money to control JE after her death”

Bada Bing,,


73 posted on 12/28/2010 8:55:11 PM PST by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: SonofReagan
I suspect his cheating was John’s way of getting back at her for the years of mental abuse she inflicted on him with her personality. Seen it a thousand times before.

Wow. I didn't read the part about what she did to him. Where can I find this? I'd be interested in reading about that part.

74 posted on 12/28/2010 8:55:12 PM PST by bannie (( ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Yaelle

Oh, please. You don’t really read the Bible, do you? Otherwise, you might discover that forgiveness is a prerequisite to salvation, vengeance belongs only to God, and God is not His name.


75 posted on 12/28/2010 8:56:54 PM PST by naturalized
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

Elizabeth Edwards turned right around and lied to the American people about the Edwards’ marriage and her husband’s character while John Edwards was running for President.

Elizabeth Edwards put her husband and herself ahead of the national interest in a political decision.

To hell with her.


76 posted on 12/28/2010 8:57:01 PM PST by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SonofReagan

Typical Liberals, all for compassion and giving money away to the poor in public and selfish heels in private.

The money they want to give is OURS, not theirs. They along with Gore and others gave less to charity than most of us regular folks.


77 posted on 12/28/2010 8:58:25 PM PST by mortal19440
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: 2banana

And how can she, from her will, turn over care of John’s children to their SISTER?

That’s not possible.

Something odd here.


78 posted on 12/28/2010 9:00:16 PM PST by Fishtalk (Dance like nobody's watching; Sing like nobody's listening; Blog like nobody's reading.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: John S Mosby

“Edwards is definitely not a fit parent, by definition,,,”

Infidelity to a spouse is not a legal ground for loss of parental rights.


79 posted on 12/28/2010 9:02:38 PM PST by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: KJC1

God rest her soul but she was a lawyer and she and hubby were cashing checks for doctors who were ruined by Edwards in fraudulent lawsuits. They became very wealthy. Both of them should have attended to her health instead of trying to run for the POTUS.

He deserves a special place in hell for also staying in the race which insured we got Obama - not that Hillary was much better. Awful McCain might have beaten Hillary.


80 posted on 12/28/2010 9:09:17 PM PST by Frantzie (American TV = owned by the Saudis and elites - keep watching & losing your freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-156 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson