Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Baynative

You didn’t even begin to answer my question!

(Most ‘I love Sarah but’ Freepers don’t want to answer. Often, but by no means always, because they are the paid Mitt/Establishment guys posting here for their team’s agenda.)


34 posted on 12/28/2010 12:36:47 PM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: 9YearLurker
I actually think there are several more likely serious contenders who will emerge during the primary debates. During that time, everyone postures and profiles and puts their best image up front for the voters.

As chair of the RNC, I think Sarah would have more influence on the direction of the party and it's influence on those already in congress. She would be an especially strong factor in the 2012 national elections.

Of course it's only my gut feeling; but, I don't yet see Sarah giving middle America the confidence in her ability to compete with despots on the world stage.

35 posted on 12/28/2010 12:51:44 PM PST by Baynative (Truth is treason in an empire of lies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson