ONE WHERE SHE AFFIRMS HE IS CONSTITUTIONALLY ELIGIBLE AND ONE WITH THAT STATMENT REMOVED
That is a very important fact. I hope it gets more attention. There is no perfect lie.
“AND SOMEONE ASK NANCY PELOSI WHY SHE SIGNED TWO DIFFERENT FORMS CERTIFYING OBAMA!!
ONE WHERE SHE AFFIRMS HE IS CONSTITUTIONALLY ELIGIBLE AND ONE WITH THAT STATMENT REMOVED “
Because Nancy is smarter than she looks. She knew all along as did everyone else in the US Congress that Bam Bam is not and was not eligible to be President. She was CYA’ing in advance.
So simple, so easy to do, so not going to happen!
AND SOMEONE ASK NANCY PELOSI WHY SHE SIGNED TWO DIFFERENT FORMS CERTIFYING OBAMA!!
ONE WHERE SHE AFFIRMS HE IS CONSTITUTIONALLY ELIGIBLE AND ONE WITH THAT STATMENT REMOVED
What a great place to start unraveling this mess and holding those who lied, committed fraud and other criminal actions accountable.
YES. This is extremely important — even a new fake birth certificate at the hands of the Hawaiian Governor can not explain away Pelosi’s two varying sworn statements.
WE NEED TO REMEMBER these other things, because we are about to be bamboozled by a fake long form BC that will be judgeproof. “Birthers” will all look like flat earthers. The fight must not end there.