Posted on 12/23/2010 6:33:50 AM PST by IbJensen
(CNSNews.com) - Wasting no time to raise funds, the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee is selling a photo of President Obama signing the repeal of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell." The legislation eventually will end the military's ban on openly homosexual troops.
"Ending this discriminatory policy is truly a monumental achievement," the DSCC wrote just hours after Obama signed the bill before a large and appreciative audience on Wednesday.
Supporters of the legislation are urged to "celebrate the repeal" by purchasing an unframed print for $25 or a "beautiful framed version" for $50.
The DSCC's fund-raising pitch calls the end of DADT "the biggest civil rights victory in years. It’s an example of America living up to our highest ideals of equality and fairness."
"Commemorate the event in your home or office," the email says.
The message was signed by J.B. Poersch, the DSCC's executive director.
They're not only the party of death, they're the party of aberrant behavior. Too bad we have RINOs that join them in their quest to destroy America.
To paraphrase:
“Again I tell you, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a democrat to enter the kingdom of God.”
LLS
The “repeal” of DADT has nothing to do with ending discrimination at all.
First, it’s not a “repeal” of anything. It’s an extension of DADT. Before DADT, people were asked, and those who answered “yes” were not allowed to join. DADT allowed them to join as long as they kept it a secret (which is hardly any different than the previous policy, but gave lip service to furthering the gay agenda). Now, it’s open.
But it never was about discrimination. It’s about propriety. The military still segregates men and women in situations where, basically, people might be nude. Women shower and bunk with women, no men allowed. Now the official word is that it’s okay to put people in a situation where they might be aroused, or where someone might look at them and be aroused, as long as it’s same sex. Hmm. I don’t want to have to sleep in the same room (or take a shower) with a man not my husband OR a lesbian. It’s inappropriate. But the extension of DADT means that if I balk at being in such a situation with a lesbian, I’m violating EO. How can that be good for anyone?
Furthermore, what will the effect be on the psychological health of young people being put into a situation where they may be leered at by members of their own sex?
No thanks. I already have a picture of the rookie Hussein signing the executive order closing Gitmo on January 22, 2009. Look how well that’s worked out.
> Ending this discriminatory
Not all discrimination is bad.
Discrimination against thieves, murderers, torturers, rapists, slave-traders, liars, adulterers, fornicators, polygamists, pedophiles, and sexual perverts is a good thing.
Why? Because these are all CHOSEN BEHAVIORS.
Discrimination based on ancestry, which is not a chosen behavior, is correctly perceived as bad.
Discrimination against “religions” like “Islam” that promote genocide, terrorism, murder, torture, piracy, thievery, pedophilia, polygamy, and slave-trading is a GOOD thing.
Why? Because such a “religion” encourages people to CHOOSE behaviors against which we must discriminate in order to enjoy a peaceful society.
Why can’t people understand these simple facts?
It is as you quoted from Isaiah 5:20 - the DemonRATs and their allies in the press and RINO party are calling evil good and good evil.
They are hopelessly confused between the two.
They are overeducated imbeciles.
They have believed the Devil’s lie, that, since they have tasted of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, they are now as gods, able to determine for themselves what is good and what is evil, making up their own rules without the direction of God Himself, without God’s External, Objective, Transcendent Truth.
“What is truth?”
~ Words of Pontius Pilate in John 18:38
Every fruit in the country should buy a picture of Larry Sinclair’s boyfriend.
Nothing like celebrating the coming of New Sodom.
Clinton’s been quiet about this....I mean this was his deal.
How much $ will that cost us?
Has anyone written an analysis of the "diversity industry" revenue system? Lawyers sue, then pay politicians to pass more lawsuit enabling laws, then they sue some more people (especially the politicians' enemies).
This pre-DA/DT practice was not only once a policy in the Armed Forces. When I was in the interview/testing process for a civilian law enforcement job, the rigorous polygraph exam included, besides questions about drug use and crimes, questions about homosexual behavior. Any answer that registered in the affirmative knocked you out - as it should have.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.