To: llevrok
If he was told of the easement when he bought the property, then he must comply with it. If the title search did not reveal the easement, then he can sue the title company.
8 posted on
12/22/2010 5:51:58 PM PST by
Blood of Tyrants
(Islam is the religion of Satan and Mohammed was his minion.)
To: Blood of Tyrants
I have a problem with some easements, but if there was an easement, he does have to comply.
10 posted on
12/22/2010 5:55:09 PM PST by
writer33
(Mark Levin Is The Constitutional Engine Of Conservatism)
To: Blood of Tyrants
Yes. The previous owner benefited from the deal. The deed is stuck with it forever...
14 posted on
12/22/2010 6:05:24 PM PST by
MileHi
( "It's coming down to patriots vs the politicians." - ovrtaxt)
To: Blood of Tyrants
Exactly, if people her are really concerned with property rights, this guy like the rest of us only gets the rights he purchased. And the property price likely reflected the easement.
26 posted on
12/22/2010 7:35:34 PM PST by
JLS
(Democrats: People who won't even let you enjoy an unseasonably warm winter day.)
To: Blood of Tyrants
These conservation easements are getting out of hand. The government owns way too much land as it is, and this results in much more being under effective gov’t control.
42 posted on
12/23/2010 6:14:32 AM PST by
FreedomPoster
(Islam delenda est.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson