Posted on 12/21/2010 4:28:02 PM PST by Clyde5445
Yeah but probably not with Iran. Something a little closer to home.
Sarah will have numerous challenges upon taking office in 2013. Not the least being military aggression from barbaric nation-states that underestimate the ability of a red blooded American woman who stands for what she believes in. Pity the mullahs and the fools that follow them.
You will get no argument here.
However, China and Russia must be told that if we have to go military, Iran will become an exclusion zone for US financial interests.
That said, there's a side of me than can see Chinese and Russian points of view. Namely, Iran is the only state of the Persian Gulf that is not fully aligned with the US or under it's direct military control and complete dependent upon the US financial and military infrastructure.
Same issue exists in east Asia...we have complete alignment with Korea, Japan, the Pacific Islands, Philippines, Taiwan and Australia.
Then again, they ARE commies...
Ok Abdullah, why don't YOU do something about it? Oh yeah, I forgot that you Saudis are Wahabbi's; you see America as the Great Satan as well. So why should YOU take control of the Middle East when you can get the infidels to do it? It's not like you don't have the military or the money not to do SOMETHING!
Just to be curious, I fed Sarah’s speech through a website giving me the grade level of her writing. The results: 9th grade.
I then ran Obama’s speech on 31 August about Iraq through the same website. The results: 8th grade.
It’s interesting that the smartest man in the world speaks at an eighth grade level. Just sayin’.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.