The Constitution tells me that I do not have to abide this illegal ruling. It is illegal and the federal government has overstepped its bounds. Odumbo is striving to say that the people he has appointed to non elected offices have greater authority than the courts There is a sysytem of checks and balances Legislative Executive and the Court. I will no0taccept the lso called it has nothing do with it is claims It is a control issue.
There's a good case for the FCC having overstepped its bounds, but this is clearly within the bounds of the federal government. The Internet is absolutely interstate commerce. It is also commerce with other nations and with the Indian tribes. It is subject to the commerce clause with original, pre-New Deal intent.
I posted this a little while ago, I'll paraphrase. I pay TWC, headquartered in New York, for Internet access. I click to watch a movie, I invoke a business relationship with Netflix in California to deliver a movie from a server in some state over a nationwide network owned by L3 in Colorado to be delivered to me in my state by a TWC subsidiary. That's not interstate commerce?