You mean other than your snake skin?
First, you vehemently defend the careerist general by saying that he "MUST" implement homosexualism in the military. Then you wave the Constitution in your defence.
And then, after I asked you point blank about the primacy of God's Law, you suddenly agree with me. It should take precedence. Yet you still dodge the question about the general's need to follow this policy.
You evade, you equivocate, you spin.
Like all liberals, you lie.
Does your church specifically preclude homos from the congregation?