Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Top Marine pledges to ‘personally lead’ gay integration
Stars and Stripes ^ | Dec. 20, 2010 | Kevin Baron

Posted on 12/20/2010 11:56:32 AM PST by LonelyCon

One week after warning the distraction of repealing “don’t ask, don’t tell” could risk Marines’ lives, Gen. James Amos, commandant of the Marine Corps, pledged to lead the effort to integrate openly gay Marines.

“I, and the Sergeant Major of the Marine Corps [Carlton Kent], will personally lead this effort, thus ensuring the respect and dignity due all Marines,” Amos said. “On this matter, we look forward to further demonstrating to the American people the discipline and loyalty that have been the hallmark of the United States Marine Corps for over 235 years."

Amos’ statement sent to reporters came Sunday evening, one day after the Senate adopted the repeal, capping a stunning, climactic day on the chamber floor.

Marine Corps leaders have shown the most resistance to repealing the 17-year old law. Former commandant Gen. James Conway said the Corps’ “pretty macho” recruits set them apart from other services.

On Dec. 3, Amos – who became the 35th commandant in October – and the chiefs of the Army and Air Force told Congress they did not want repeal now, based on the results of a DOD troop survey. The survey found Marines in combat arms units much more opposed to the repeal than other elements of the force, or the complete military.

[Snip]

Here is Amos’ full statement:

"Fidelity is the essence of the United States Marine Corps. Above all else, we are loyal to the Constitution, our Commander in Chief, Congress, our Chain of Command, and the American people. The House of Representatives and the Senate have voted to repeal Title 10, US Code 654 "Policy Concerning Homosexuality in the United States Armed Forces." As stated during my testimony before Congress in September and again during hearings before the Senate Armed Services Committee earlier this month, the Marine Corps will step out smartly to faithfully implement this new policy. I, and the Sergeant Major of the Marine Corps, will personally lead this effort, thus ensuring the respect and dignity due all Marines. On this matter, we look forward to further demonstrating to the American people the discipline and loyalty that have been the hallmark of the United States Marine Corps for over 235 years."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: dadt; dontask; dontaskdonttell; donttell; homosexualagenda; jamesamos; marines
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280281-298 next last
To: LonelyCon; surroundedbyblue; shurwouldluv_a_smallergov; Judith Anne; rkjohn; PadreL; ...
+

Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:

Add me / Remove me

Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of general interest.

261 posted on 12/20/2010 5:31:56 PM PST by narses ( 'Prefer nothing to the love of Christ.')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

No, I’m recommending that he either resign as a matter of principle or refuse to comply with an immoral law that was cynically passed by an anti-American rump Congress by filing for an injunction.


262 posted on 12/20/2010 5:34:05 PM PST by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 260 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Congress has passed plenty of horrible laws in the last two centuries, that DOES NOT make it right.

No, it doesn't. It doesn't make it "moral" either. But what it does do is make it ~lawful~. The oath is to obey lawful orders. We heard where this Marine stands with respect to the wisdom of this law. Now he must obey it anyway. He has no other choice but to resign his post and hand this sack of crap to somebody else. That's not the habit of Marines.

I think this action by Congress is abhorrent but I will not join in throwing a good Marine under the bus, only for doing his duty.

263 posted on 12/20/2010 5:34:24 PM PST by Ramius (Personally, I give us... one chance in three. More tea?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies]

To: Iron Munro
[When he says he “will personally lead this effort, thus ensuring the respect and dignity due all Marines”, I believe he is saying that he will not allow homosexuals, or their conduct, to erode the respect and dignity of the Marine Corps in general and specifically, that of the non-homosexual Marines.]

I hope you are right.

We'll see.
264 posted on 12/20/2010 5:35:05 PM PST by LomanBill (Animals! The DemocRats blew up the windmill with an Acorn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

You’re asking him to turn his back on his Marines and his Corps.


265 posted on 12/20/2010 5:38:09 PM PST by Ramius (Personally, I give us... one chance in three. More tea?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies]

To: LomanBill

We’ll see... yes. Meanwhild, FR once again forms a circular firing squad...


266 posted on 12/20/2010 5:41:30 PM PST by Ramius (Personally, I give us... one chance in three. More tea?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 264 | View Replies]

To: LomanBill

We’ll see... yes. Meanwhile, FR once again forms a circular firing squad...


267 posted on 12/20/2010 5:41:52 PM PST by Ramius (Personally, I give us... one chance in three. More tea?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 264 | View Replies]

To: TexasTransplant
Was it scheduled for a Vote prior to the Elections? Were there Candidates “Running” on your hot button issue? Did they win?

It seems I'm the only person on Free Republic who isn't somehow surprised that a Democrat majority congress managed to pass a repeal on DADT. Practically everyone else here is acting shellshocked as though they were blindsided by something they never in a million years saw coming.

268 posted on 12/20/2010 5:51:11 PM PST by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 259 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

If you’re not recommending open rebellion then your comparison with George Washington is absurd. What you are recommending is that he abandon the Marine Corps to someone who has no problem with the new law. The law may be immoral but it’s not illegal and as a Marine he will carry out his lawful orders.


269 posted on 12/20/2010 5:51:50 PM PST by TigersEye (Who crashed the markets on 9/28/08 and why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie; DJ MacWoW; trisham; wagglebee; little jeremiah

Grow up.........

How old are you? Twelve?


270 posted on 12/20/2010 5:52:47 PM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies]

To: LomanBill
I hope you are right. We'll see.

He is Old Corps and believe he will do his best.
But the handwriting is on the wall; he will be retired and replaced by someone who will actively push the Obama/democrat pro-homosexual agenda.

Straight people will be bailing out en mass as their enlistments expire over the next few years. In 5 years we won't recognize the military - it will look like the Danish Army.

Something most proponents of a European style pro-gay military miss out on is that they have essentially been useless since they went gay and politically correct. It hasn't been a real problem for them because the entire continent has relied on the USA to do the heavy lifting for 65 years.

Once the USA military is reduced to a combination social club for gays and busywork employer of minorities we won't be able to carry the burden for Europe, or for ourselves either.

The architects of a military that is redirected as a solution for social problems, is openly gay and burdened with incompetents don't realize that there are some very bad people in the world. Their militaries will roll over a politically correct military where the focus is on "social justice" rather than military competence and strength.

We are doomed.


271 posted on 12/20/2010 6:02:08 PM PST by Iron Munro ("Damn it, Jim! I'm a doctor not a race relations Czar in the Obama administration.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 264 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

An excellent point. It’s appalling, but hardly surprising.

It brings up another question: why do we let a lame-duck Congress do *anything* at all? A company that fires an employee doesn’t let them keep their keys and network access for a couple of months. Why do we let Congress when they’ve been fired?

I suppose, normally, they haven’t typically done very much so it’s never been such a big deal. But now it’s different. I don’t remember any previous Congress that’s been so openly vindictive toward the will of the people.


272 posted on 12/20/2010 6:02:53 PM PST by Ramius (Personally, I give us... one chance in three. More tea?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 268 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner

Thanks for the link. This is a list of his medals. The graph is at the link.

Naval Aviator insignia Office of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Identification Badge
1st Row Navy Distinguished Service Medal
2nd row Defense Superior Service Medal Legion of Merit w/ 1 award star Bronze Star Meritorious Service Medal
3rd Row Joint Service Commendation Medal Navy and Marine Corps Achievement Medal Navy Presidential Unit Citation Joint Meritorious Unit Award w/ 1 oak leaf cluster
4th Row Navy Unit Commendation Navy Meritorious Unit Commendation w/ 1 service star National Defense Service Medal w/ 2 service stars Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal
5th Row Kosovo Campaign Medal w/ 2 service stars Iraq Campaign Medal w/ 1 service star Global War on Terrorism Expeditionary Medal Global War on Terrorism Service Medal
6th Row Armed Forces Service Medal Navy Sea Service Deployment Ribbon w/ 1 silver service star Navy and Marine Corps Overseas Service Ribbon w/ 1 service star NATO Medal for Yugoslavia w/ 1 service star


273 posted on 12/20/2010 6:03:00 PM PST by Not gonna take it anymore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: Iron Munro

Well said.


274 posted on 12/20/2010 6:04:05 PM PST by Ramius (Personally, I give us... one chance in three. More tea?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies]

To: Ramius
It brings up another question: why do we let a lame-duck Congress do *anything* at all? A company that fires an employee doesn’t let them keep their keys and network access for a couple of months. Why do we let Congress when they’ve been fired?

I suppose, normally, they haven’t typically done very much so it’s never been such a big deal. But now it’s different. I don’t remember any previous Congress that’s been so openly vindictive toward the will of the people.

I agree. It was a chickens**t move to push this through in a lame-duck session. There shouldn't even be lame-duck sessions! The two month period following elections should be reserved for administrative work, handovers, setting up offices, getting staffers hired and relocated, etc.

275 posted on 12/20/2010 6:19:02 PM PST by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 272 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

Ah, the usual sweetheart.


276 posted on 12/20/2010 6:25:09 PM PST by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point.CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies]

To: littleharbour

Will there ever be one of these brass who has the guts to actually resign on principle when this type of crap is forced on the US millitary?

***************************

Conway did and BO replaced him with Amos.


277 posted on 12/20/2010 6:49:02 PM PST by JouleZ (You are the company you keep.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ramius

To the contrary. He has just publicly declared that he is turning his back on the Marines and embracing the Democrats’ agenda. I am suggesting that he reconsider.


278 posted on 12/20/2010 7:49:40 PM PST by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 265 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
Washington did not begin by advocating armed resistance. Like the other Founders, he exhausted every other available avenue to dissuade the government from embracing tyranny. Your suggestion that Washington's first reaction was to take up arms is absurd.

As far as the alleged "legality" of this Congressional crime is concerned, the ancient principle of lex mala lex nulla applies.

279 posted on 12/20/2010 7:57:13 PM PST by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

I just don’t agree. I can still respect the man for doing his duty to obey a lawful order, even when he clearly does not agree with it. It’s just not his fault this is happening and he shouldn’t be the scape-goat like is happening here. Fault lies in the vindictive lame-duck Congress that is governing against the will of the people.

But I think the matter has been pretty thoroughly argued on this thread, and frankly I don’t have anything else to add.


280 posted on 12/20/2010 8:01:04 PM PST by Ramius (Personally, I give us... one chance in three. More tea?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 278 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280281-298 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson