I'll admit to being very discouraged with our leadership since Ronald Reagan (may he rest in peace).
While RR was not perfect, none of us are, his actions were always driven to make the USA a better place and something to be very proud of. Again he was not perfect.
Today's politicians on both sides of the aisle are way more concerned with retaining power especially for their party and the country be damned.
We are facing a perfect storm of progressives (who have to hide their love of Marx, Mao, Stalin and even their admiration of those who believed in eugenics). They see this as the right time to take over. They have given away the country economically and made us very vulnerable so as to position themselves to gain total power globally. Yet we sit by and watch American Idol (well not me but others).
This Chinese water torture of daily increases in regulation, law, fees, taxes, 1/2 truth reporting by the media, “professors” who are nothing more than the radical maggot infested, hygiene deficient, dope smoking cockroaches of humanity, all working against what the founders risked their lives and fortunes for.
Do you believe we have enough believers in the founder's brilliance to take the country back by what ever means remain?
“Do you believe we have enough believers in the founder’s brilliance to take the country back by what ever means remain?”
It’s always been my contention that we’re fighting this war on too wide of a front. We’re not concentrating on fighting smaller battles that are easier to win. Winning small battles eventually adds up and you win the war.
Sending 650 new patriots into state legislatures this past election was a huge victory. We now control 30 state legislatures. The amount of damage state legislators can inflict on the criminal fascist syndicate occupying Washington is limitless. This is where our strength lies today, if conservatives take advantage of that and support these new law makers.
I posted this on another thread. It’s one example of a tool we can use to exploit the enemy’s lines and weaken it.
I still need to study this more, so it’s coming off the top of head.
In about 1995, a federal court in Utah ruled that counties and tribes are sovereign entities and the federal government can’t force them to do the bidding of the federal government.
Before that we had the Sheriff Mack Supreme Court ruling that said the federal government cannot draft a sheriff to implement Clinton’s antigun legislation.
Recently the federal court ruled in the Virginia case that obumacare is unconstitutional.
What two of these three cases have in common is that local legislatures and a state legislature first passed legislation saying, in essence, that they’re sovereign entities and as such, the federal government doesn’t have the authority to order them to carry out federal mandates.
The courts have agreed in all three cases that other governments, from local to state, are sovereign, and as such they have the power to disobey and thus nullify the federal government decrees.
These cases, I believe, give states ammo to pass legislation defying various federal decrees and the courts will back them.
As I said, I need to understand this better to get a more clear picture for myself and others.
There’s other tools, too, like the Data Quality Act (DQA). Under DQA anyone - you, me, your neighbor - can challenge any rule written by a federal bureaucracy for its scientific integrity. In other words, if you believe some bureaucrat rule didn’t use the best science, you can demand to see the science behind it.
If the science is flawed, you can demand the rule be rescinded. DQA, quite simply, is a giant killer. Entire bureaucratic fiefdoms can be wiped out.