“Do you believe we have enough believers in the founder’s brilliance to take the country back by what ever means remain?”
It’s always been my contention that we’re fighting this war on too wide of a front. We’re not concentrating on fighting smaller battles that are easier to win. Winning small battles eventually adds up and you win the war.
Sending 650 new patriots into state legislatures this past election was a huge victory. We now control 30 state legislatures. The amount of damage state legislators can inflict on the criminal fascist syndicate occupying Washington is limitless. This is where our strength lies today, if conservatives take advantage of that and support these new law makers.
I posted this on another thread. It’s one example of a tool we can use to exploit the enemy’s lines and weaken it.
I still need to study this more, so it’s coming off the top of head.
In about 1995, a federal court in Utah ruled that counties and tribes are sovereign entities and the federal government can’t force them to do the bidding of the federal government.
Before that we had the Sheriff Mack Supreme Court ruling that said the federal government cannot draft a sheriff to implement Clinton’s antigun legislation.
Recently the federal court ruled in the Virginia case that obumacare is unconstitutional.
What two of these three cases have in common is that local legislatures and a state legislature first passed legislation saying, in essence, that they’re sovereign entities and as such, the federal government doesn’t have the authority to order them to carry out federal mandates.
The courts have agreed in all three cases that other governments, from local to state, are sovereign, and as such they have the power to disobey and thus nullify the federal government decrees.
These cases, I believe, give states ammo to pass legislation defying various federal decrees and the courts will back them.
As I said, I need to understand this better to get a more clear picture for myself and others.
There’s other tools, too, like the Data Quality Act (DQA). Under DQA anyone - you, me, your neighbor - can challenge any rule written by a federal bureaucracy for its scientific integrity. In other words, if you believe some bureaucrat rule didn’t use the best science, you can demand to see the science behind it.
If the science is flawed, you can demand the rule be rescinded. DQA, quite simply, is a giant killer. Entire bureaucratic fiefdoms can be wiped out.
The Data Quality Act would seem to be made for combating the climate change hoax and the EPA ruling on C02 being a pollutant.
Without going too far off topic, the secondary problem with the climate change fiasco is the scientists have been so discredited by their own actions that any sane and logical approach to reducing real pollution (which should be a goal of everyone) becomes impossible as it is now 100% political.
Thanks for the info. Very informative to say the least.