Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Wurlitzer
"So the sites were closed down only after the case went to trial and the appeal process RIGHT??????????????????????"

I would venture "the trial" was held in a smokey backroom after a large sum of money changed hands then the FEDs shut down the site.

easy peasy Japaneasy...

8 posted on 12/20/2010 7:41:08 AM PST by Mad Dawgg (If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the 2nd one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Mad Dawgg

Here’s an interesting tidbit;

Yet after being shown the affidavit, the operator of dajaz1.com — a widely read hip-hop blog that posts new songs and videos — disputed many of the warrant’s examples of what it called copyright infringement. He said that, like much of the material on his site, the songs had been sent to him for promotional purposes by record labels and the artists.
As proof, the operator, a Queens man who declined to give his real name but is known online as Splash, showed The New York Times several e-mails from record label employees and third-party marketers offering songs mentioned in the affidavit.
“It’s not my fault if someone at a record label is sending me the song,” Splash said.


9 posted on 12/20/2010 7:57:41 AM PST by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ( Ya can't pick up a turd by the clean end!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson