IMO, Boortz exposes his clay feet on this matter. Boortz likes to be seen as the ultimate libertarian and generally espouses those views. By supporting the use of force by a government school, it is obvious his libertarianism is nuanced rather than principled.
I do not support every position taken by Mike Adams but in this matter he seems well-grounded.
The problem is, it’s not clear exactly what is being required of this student. The school has contradicted her claims, so it’s hard to know what to believe.
If a mathematics student refused to learn multiplication, or a medical student insists on learning the anatomy of only one gender, is it a use of force by a government school to say the student hasn’t completed the requirements for the degree?