Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Barak to Gates: Buy 'Namer' Vehicles for US Army
Arutz Sheva, Israel ^ | 12/14/10 | Gil Ronen

Posted on 12/19/2010 8:58:17 PM PST by sukhoi-30mki

Barak to Gates: Buy 'Namer' Vehicles for US Army

by Gil Ronen

Defense Minister Ehud Barak met with his American counterpart, Robert Gates, in Washington Monday. The two reportedly discussed various issues pertaining to maintaining Israel's qualitative military advantage over its neighbors, the Iranian threat, and the situation in Lebanon, as well as continuing the nations' cooperation on active defense systems against rockets and missiles fired at Israel.

Barak also tried to convince Gates that the US military should purchase Israel-produced Namer [pronounced Nuh-MEHR, the word means 'tiger' in Hebrew] infantry fighting vehicles.

The Namer IFV is based on a Merkava Mark IV chassis and armed with either M2 Browning machine gun or Mk 19 grenade launcher mounted on a Samson Remote Controlled Weapon Station, It also has another 7.62 mm MAG machine gun and a 60 mm mortar.

Namer carries up to 12 crewmen and infantrymen and a stretcher, or two stretchers and medical equipment.

Barak told Gates that the

(Excerpt) Read more at israelnationalnews.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Israel; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: apc; israel; namer; usarmy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last
To: archy; Gringo1; Matthew James; Fred Mertz; Squantos; colorado tanker; The Shrew; SLB; Darksheare; ..
Free Republic Treadhead Ping


21 posted on 12/20/2010 5:23:11 AM PST by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BradyLS
Over on the link page, commenters claim the vehicle is made in the US (and better protected than the Bradley).
22 posted on 12/20/2010 5:39:14 AM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine .. now it is your turn..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ASOC

Thrilling!!!


23 posted on 12/20/2010 6:24:08 AM PST by BradyLS (DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: muleskinner
Remember the M114?


24 posted on 12/20/2010 6:48:31 AM PST by csmusaret (Q: How do they say incompetent failure in Kenya? A: Barack Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA

Congress outlawed that vehicle.

(I believe with the agenda of reducing family size)


25 posted on 12/20/2010 6:50:05 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a (de)humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster

Thanks for the ping.....Namer is a true urban assault vehicle....a can of whoopass x12 inside every one of them.


26 posted on 12/20/2010 6:50:23 AM PST by DCBryan1 (FORGET the lawyers...first kill the "journalists". (Die Ritter der Kokosnuss))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA

That is one behemoth of a wagon!

Call me crazy, but I have been wanting a 1968 to ‘72 Vista Cruiser for years now.


27 posted on 12/20/2010 6:54:23 AM PST by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Hiryusan; glorgau

The engine placement would definitely be an issue. The Israelis and Russians tried to address this with the heavies they made from old T-54/55’s (the Achzarit and the BTR-T) but neither look wholly to have been successful. The Israelis somehow managed to squeeze in a rear door next to the engine, but it sticks out like a sore thumb. Russia apparently is satisfied with having the troops jump out of roof hatches(!).


28 posted on 12/20/2010 7:14:53 AM PST by DemforBush (I got three passports, a couple of visas. You don't even know my real name..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: DemforBush
The biggest problem facing anyone who wishes to recycle old armored vehicles (tanks) into APCs is engine placement. All American tanks like the M4, M26/M46, M47, M48, M60, and M1 have rear-mounted engines. However, location of the final drive and transmission have been moved from the front to the rear to make things much more compact.

The Israeli Merkava (”Chariot” in Hebrew) Mk IV main battle tank (MBT) has a front-mounted engine-transmission combination, with rear door. The Merkava MBT can carry four infantrymen in the rear in addition to their crew. The Merkava MBT is armored accordingly. The Merkava-derived APC “Namer” shares these attributes.

Alternately, the M113A3 “Gavin” is more of a lightly armored “battle taxi” for infantry that's designed to protect the occupants from shell fragments. The M2/M3 Bradley/Chaffee armored infantry fighting vehicles are very much improvements over the M113, but neither can compete with “Namer” for use in the urban warfare environment.

“Namer” puts its troopers under heavy armor and has a remotely controlled weapons system with day/night targeting ability. Combine this with the IDF “Trophy” vehicle defense system against AT rockets and missiles and you have the most advanced APC available today.

29 posted on 12/20/2010 7:54:50 AM PST by MasterGunner01 (To err is human; to forgive is not our policy. -- SEAL Team SIX)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: BradyLS
"Is that the one built on the chassis of surplus Soviet tanks? "

"The Namer IFV is based on a Merkava Mark IV chassis and "

Ya trying ta put everyone on eh?

30 posted on 12/20/2010 9:52:21 AM PST by An Old Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: An Old Man

I posted before I read the article. Sorry for the confusion.


31 posted on 12/20/2010 12:12:45 PM PST by BradyLS (DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; bigheadfred; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; Delacon; ...
The Namer IFV is based on a Merkava Mark IV chassis and armed with either M2 Browning machine gun or Mk 19 grenade launcher mounted on a Samson Remote Controlled Weapon Station, It also has another 7.62 mm MAG machine gun and a 60 mm mortar.
Israel's been building some decent UAVs. I will not be at all surprised to see Israel field the first combat robots. Thanks sukhoi-30mki.


32 posted on 12/20/2010 4:21:51 PM PST by SunkenCiv (The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BradyLS

THe Merkava was designed from the ground up tp be the most survivable MBT ever.

And has worked out pretty well.


33 posted on 12/20/2010 10:10:51 PM PST by ASOC (What are you doing now that Mexico has become OUR Chechnya?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
Middle East and terrorism, occasional political and Jewish issues Ping List. High Volume

If you’d like to be on or off, please FR mail me.

..................

34 posted on 12/21/2010 12:28:47 PM PST by SJackson (In wine there is wisdom, In beer there is freedom, In water there is bacteria.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Think I like their Barak better than our Barak...


35 posted on 12/21/2010 12:56:31 PM PST by Friend_from_the_Frozen_North ("I say we take off and nuke the entire site from orbit." Ellen Ripley, Aliens 1986)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

“I will not be at all surprised to see Israel field the first combat robots.”

Has Sara Connor been warned?


36 posted on 12/23/2010 12:17:55 PM PST by Eleutheria5 (End the occupation. Annex today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Eleutheria5

Some guy, said he was from the future...


37 posted on 12/23/2010 7:11:46 PM PST by SunkenCiv (The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson