delenda est...
Posted on 12/18/2010 3:11:51 PM PST by jazusamo
Submarines will be the worst.
And Fragging on a sub is tough to do.
Yes, Anita Bryant was right, she told it like she saw it.
This whole LGBT agenda and the way they’ve forced themselves on society gives new meaning to the old saying, “give an inch and they’ll take a mile.” Very sad!
just what an army in combat needs to be dealing with.
This is beyond ignorant...it is grossly immoral.
Of course, forcing homosexuals to shower with heterosexuals doesn't have the same effect on the homosexuals, because the homosexuals know the men aren't leering at them, like the homosexuals are leering at the men. It's a one-way attraction, which makes it precisely the kind of unbalanced interaction that "don't ask, don't tell" minimized.
So now, not only to homosexuals get to openly declare their sexual proclivities, but the heterosexuals will be forced to parade naked in front of the homosexuals. The gays will say that this is only fair -- but where are those same people arguing that the female soldiers should be forced to parade naked in front of the men?
Correct.
delenda est...
Yuck, gag, SPIT.
It’s discrimination to separate? BS
It’s discrimination to let some peter-gazer gaze away.
I fully agree, but then it has been said that “...stupid is as stupid does” and they are proving this beyond any doubt in my mind.
Well said! Unfortunately the ignorant and immoral people in the chain of command from Obama to Gates to Mullen do not give a whit, just as do not the Senators and Representatives that shoved this down the peoples throats.
So at the base gym, is there going to be 4 shower rooms? The 2 extra being one for lesbians and the other for gay men? Or do they throw the lesbians and gay males together?
And 4 public restrooms too?
Inquiring minds want to know.
The army came out in style this weekend when it launched a recruitment drive aimed at tempting more gays, lesbians, transvestites and even transsexuals into the ranks.
Style, indeed, the old Poofter Army Drill of Monty Python comes true ... funny, though, they don't give any information on how many are serving or how many or what type of problems there have beeen.
They created another victim class that will run crying to the CO every time they get their fellings hurt. I am glad I no longer have to serve in the military our politicians have made it a joke.
They don’t have to build seperate facilities. Gay men can shower with women and lesbians can shower with men. The same with bunks.
They’ve just taken CF to a whole new level.
Agreed. This is insane.
Roger that!
The equal protection clause should ensure the visual stimulation of one and all. /sarc
First, the language of the amendment is confusing; it was clearly slapped together, so it’s not readily apparent what it does.
It does clearly state that “NO BENEFITS” go with this bill: “Benefits- Nothing in this section, or the amendments made by this section, shall be construed to require the furnishing of benefits in violation of section 7 of title 1, United States Code (relating to the definitions of `marriage’ and `spouse’ and referred to as the `Defense of Marriage Act’).”
It also clearly states that nobody can SUE because of this bill: “No Private Cause of Action- Nothing in this section, or the amendments made by this section, shall be construed to create a private cause of action.”
The actions it takes relative to codes appears to be only two:
1: TITLE 10- Upon the effective date established by subsection (b), chapter 37 of title 10, United States Code, is amended (A) by striking section 654; and (B) in the table of sections at the beginning of such chapter, by striking the item relating to section 654.
2: CONFORMING AMENDMENT- Upon the effective date established by subsection (b), section 571 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1994 (10 U.S.C. 654 note) is amended by striking subsections (b), (c), and (d).
Title 10 section 654 must be the section that says no gays in the military, and section 571 of 1994 authorization is clearly the “Don’t ask, Don’t Tell” provision.
So it certainly doesn’t appear that they did anything about the UCMJ. Although that is not governed by law, right?
Normally, it wouldn’t matter since the supreme court struck down sodomy laws as unconstitutional. BUT, the court has ruled that the military doesn’t have to follow the same constitutional restrictions, so the sodomy rules could well still apply.
Buy my guess is Obama will simply re-write that part of the code, so unless someone passes a law dictating that section of the code, we are probably out of luck.
But what if they are bi-sexual?
That is not their plan.
They all think they’re so much smarter than the fly-over population.
But, why don’t they force males and females to use the same showers?
Would different equipment make that much difference if there weren’t attraction?
I walked into a unit shower in Germany years ago. It was late in the evening...10 PM or so....this was during my enlisted days.
And some freak must have just taken in Extenz. It grossed me out. I just turned and left. I assumed he’d been whupping up on his meat. I wasn’t gonna stay and ask.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.