[Oberon]

Hypothetically, what if one were opposed to the homosexual agenda, and yet considered “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” a relatively trivial matter? Would that hypothetical person get booted?

[Jim Robinson]

If you wish to support the homosexual agenda, then get your gay libertarian ass off of FR. That clear enough for you?

[WXRGina]

Then, hypothetically that person does not understand the destructive consequences to our military the repeal of DADT represents. Hypothetically, that person has not “thought it through,” or is ignorant of the true, vile nature of homosexuality and how introducing the blatant flaunting of it among our troops will only hurt America’s national security.

[John D]

Hypothetically, what if one were opposed to the homosexual agenda, and yet considered “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” a relatively trivial matter?

You have never served have you? Anybody who has ever served knows that a queer in the bunk next to you is NO trivial matter. Unless you are also a queer. Which is it, are you a queer?

[manc]

it is not trivial , sharing a room and shower with homosexuals is very important and only those who think it is not important need to get their heads our of their ass along with seeing the bigger picture of another step in their agenda.
“None of this crap of well I now some and they are nice”
Those who say that are part of the problem and are promoting the homosexual agenda and are not conservative nor even in the right mind IMHO

[little jeremiah]

Hypothetically, what if one were opposed to the homosexual agenda, and yet considered “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” a relatively trivial matter? Would that hypothetical person get booted?

Such a person is a liar, and is really supporting the faggot agenda.

Next question.