If you support the homosexual agenda you are anti-Constitution and you'll get the zot from FR!

Jim Robinson

[azishot]

Wish you could “ZOT” the so-called Republicans who voted to repeal DADT.

[swheats]

I was trying to figure out how to answer that post, but that’ll do. LOL

[Jim Robinson]

Hope we can zot them all in 2012, 2014, 2016.

[Extremely Extreme Extremist]

Well said, Jim.

[rogue yam]

The site owner has provided guidance on the limits of debate here on his site, Free Republic.

He posted this guidance on the following thread:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1103363/posts

[PhilDragoo]

In 1964 I went with fellow YAFers to their convention in New York to draft Goldwater over Rockefeller to oppose LBJ.

I attended the debate in which M. Stanton Evans, then-editor of the now-defunct Indianapolis News (whom Ann Coulter calls “the greatest living authority on Joe McCarthy”) pulverized Dr. Robert C. Risk head of the Indiana Civil Liberties Union.

In our YAFer shouting match with the bearded Marxist entourage of Risk lay the supreme irony of the “liberal” “progressive” revolution for a “workers' utopia”:

The intention of the Left is to destroy the existing God, Family, Constitution, Property, Morality structure so they may freely crush, imprison and murder.

Radical homosexuals and radical atheists and proponents of political correctness and enviromental fanatics and peddlers of nonargumentative moderation are all dresses in the closet of the Marxist-Leninist dream:

It is identical to that of any totalitarian whether communist, fascist, taliban:

Eric Blair's iconic boot on a face forever.

The recent election is only the newest, most visible expression of Free Americans' revulsion to the Left's Sewage-nami.

Jim Robinson as Hercules has diverted a river to clean the Augean Stables.

Leaving behind a clean, pine scent.

[keepthefaith]

You rock Jim. I knew I loved this site!

[Jim Robinson]

If you wish to support the homosexual agenda, then get your gay libertarian ass off of FR. That clear enough for you?

[Nosterrex]

Why would what I have said rise to the occasion for a zot? Has it come to the point that even a discussion about a discussion is now Verboten? I have said on every single post that FR is free to post whatever it wants and to ban whomever it wants. I have said that I do not support abortion or homosexuality. If FR has become so paranoid that anyone that encourages free speech is somehow seen as evil, what does that say? In answer to your question, I would not want people advocating either abortion or homosexuality in my home. On the other hand, I would not throw someone out of my house for wanting to discuss the matter with me. I have the right to throw anyone out that I want, but having the right to do something does not always make it right.

[Pablo64]

Amen!

[WXRGina]

Then, hypothetically that person does not understand the destructive consequences to our military the repeal of DADT represents. Hypothetically, that person has not “thought it through,” or is ignorant of the true, vile nature of homosexuality and how introducing the blatant flaunting of it among our troops will only hurt America’s national security.

[circlecity]

You made that point early on. Now you’ve just been arguing with Jim’s decision. And agitating. The sentiment is clearly against you and in support of Jim. Proceed at your own risk.

[2111USMC]

Yep, that's been grating on me too.

When we went through the entrance examinations they asked you straight up if your were a homo. Any affirmative response got your ass booted out the door immediately.

DADT was implemented by the Clinton administration to open the door for fags. The purpose of this so called “repeal” is to open the door all of the way so that psycho perverts can practice their disgusting behavior/sickness openly.

[Oberon]

If you wish to support the homosexual agenda, then get your gay libertarian ass off of FR. That clear enough for you?

I don't see any 'gay libertarian asses' around here, but if I do see one I'll be sure and let them know.

Thanks for the information.

[wagglebee]

Wish you could “ZOT” the so-called Republicans who voted to repeal DADT.

Am I the only one who remembers all the threads a year ago when we were being assured that Scott Brown was a genuine "conservative"? In fact, I distinctly recall reading that he was downright "presidential."

[John D]

Hypothetically, what if one were opposed to the homosexual agenda, and yet considered “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” a relatively trivial matter?

You have never served have you? Anybody who has ever served knows that a queer in the bunk next to you is NO trivial matter. Unless you are also a queer. Which is it, are you a queer?

[pops88]

“I would not want people advocating either abortion or homosexuality in my home. On the other hand, I would not throw someone out of my house for wanting to discuss the matter with me. I have the right to throw anyone out that I want, but having the right to do something does not always make it right.”

And would you feel the same way if multiple people came to your home, day after day, 365 days a year, including holidays and wanted to do this? I wouldn’t and for the years Jim’s been running this site, he doesn’t either. There’s a time to put a foot down and say “enough.”

[central_va]

And what is wrong with serving your country? It sounds like you are with all the liberals who want all the benefits of a free country, but are unwilling to make any sacrifices yourself.

Here zot, here zot zot zot.

[davandbar]

“I worked with a lesbo ( old bag with many mental problems..go figure ) and we got into an argument about fag rights...she said it was not right that her “partner” could not automatically inherit her crap because they could not be legally married...

Gay marriage is not the solution to this problem—the solution is to change inheritance law! Anyone should be allowed to leave their interitance to anyone they choose WITHOUT ANY GOVERNMENT INTERFERENCE / TAXATION!!!!

[circlecity]

"Am I the only one who remembers all the threads a year ago when we were being assured that Scott Brown was a genuine "conservative"? In fact, I distinctly recall reading that he was downright "presidential."

You recall correctly. You know, usually I think that Mike Savage guy on the radio is kind of a kook, BUT, I've got to give him credit; He saw through Brown from the word go.