Spookydude.
Posted on 12/17/2010 8:38:29 PM PST by BreitbartSentMe
Will someone please, please explain to me how the first black president was some insane white redneck from the ghetto of Arkansas, while the first woman president was a pansy black guy supposedly from Hawaii?
Spookydude.
I don’t know that Jarrett is president but its pretty clear that O is not.
but he still did his job: slam Sarah.....I am amazed how many folks are really scared of her...
Well, she may be one of the shadows; but think John Podesta an ever bigger one; and of course; there is the really ‘big one’ - the Soros shadow; from whom all others cast themselves.
Please explain to me your interpretation of “Ghetto”. Slick Willey is not insane. He is just doing what his dear wife, from Chicago, says do.
Redneck meant people who were farmers and had to do back breaking work while bending over. The backs of their necks got sunburned a lot. I don’t see anything wrong with that. They were helping feed the Country. At least, they were not living off Uncle Sugar’s teat.
What?? Where is that mentioned anywhere in what I posted?
It isn't, it's just wishful thinking backed up by homosexual health statistics...
THE POWER OF THE PRESS.
OK, Apparently Ulsterman has officially been outed as a fraud, using fictitious quotes from fictitious experts.
http://ulster-man.blogspot.com/
Undoubtedly his DC Insider is yet another fictitious source. Sorry for posting this nonsense, it won’t happen again.
No need to apologize to me.
Even if Ulsterman and the DC Insider are 'fraudulent' , Most of what Ulsterman/DC Insider refer to is factual.
I have read other articles , from other sources, that point to JARRET and MICHELLE being the real decision makers.
Rahm did run away from the Obama Administrative staff, to Chicago.
The Dems are 'mad' at Obama now.
All of those things the DC INSIDER/Ulsterman had articles about, before the MSM.
If we are going to judge someone on performance, the DC INSIDER is hitting %100 right now.
No need to apologize to me.
Even if Ulsterman and the DC Insider are 'fraudulent' , Most of what Ulsterman/DC Insider refer to is factual.
I have read other articles , from other sources, that point to JARRET and MICHELLE being the real decision makers.
Rahm did run away from the Obama Administrative staff, to Chicago.
The Dems are 'mad' at Obama now.
All of those things the DC INSIDER/Ulsterman had articles about, before the MSM.
If we are going to judge someone on performance, the DC INSIDER is hitting %100 right now.
Who owns that site and how are they vetted for truthfulness?
You would think, that if Jarrett really was lying about what the CEO’s told Obama... SOMEONE at CNBC could follow up on that, and get themselves one heck of a story.
Don’t they have contacts with some of those CEO’s??
Harwood won’t do it though... he’s IN THE TANK for Obama. Probably has an Obama statuette on his dashboard.
I don’t know that, the link was given to me by someone who used to do a ping list for the DC Insider reports. There has been a lot of discussion before on these threads with many people coming to the conclusion that there really was no actual insider, the author was just using that device to compile the rumors he was hearing.
I just wanted people to have the information I was given so they could make their own decision.
Triond owns Newsflavor and there is no editorial process. I have submitted false articles before that have been printed. I wrote a fake article about Tom Delay that’s still on their site. Here’s a link to a site where Ulsterman complains that Triond is publishing garbage: http://getsatisfaction.com/triond/topics/keep_newsflavor_legit
And then somebody replies: “are you serious? YOUR articles are made up.”
Ulsterman is so shameless it hurts.
And if you want to say “it’s fake but accurate,” remember that Democrats said the same thing when Newsweek reported a Quaran being flushed down a toilet. Sure, the article was wrong, but it still probably happened, right? Don’t fall into that trap.
Yea Spookydude.... But how many puppets does he have you suppose? I mean the guy has to know how to layer an organization. He could very well be manipulating the strings of a behind the scenes person, who’s then manipulating Zero’s.
She does have a history with the boy. And an agenda of her own. I could see Spookydude pulling her strings and she Zero’s.
Honestly I don’t know what to believe anymore. All the crap that has transpired under this president and congress it’s hard to believe and we see it happening with our own eyes.
Jarrett brought in Van Jones he left just as silently as he came. Why would it be hard to believe that a semi-insider is talking?
What’s funny is we have the great Copenhagen bust due to emails being exposed, we have Wikileaks exposes files of private dealings going on and we still want to say there can’t be anyone dropping insider info about the current white house squatters.
It’s possible that an insider would come out and say these things, but they wouldn’t say them to an unknown blogger with no credibility who doesn’t even have editorial access to the website they post on. Ulsterman has to send Triond a request to move his articles if they get published on the wrong website. What happens if the insider wants something pulled? Ulsterman can’t delete his own content, he can only request for it to be deleted if he has a legitimate reason, and Triond reserves the rights to suspend or terminate your account and keep your content for whatever reason they want.
That’s not exactly a breeding ground for a serious White House expose.
If there were an insider, they would be very careful to get the information to a top notch source already held in high esteem within the field of journalism. And they’d be awfully careful about what they did and didn’t say. They wouldn’t reveal secrets “on a dare.” Just add it all up and the whole thing is absurd.
The great thing about blogs is that anybody can get attention for writing a story. The bad thing about blogs is ANYBODY can get attention for writing a story. And it’s long past the time when people should have turned their heads away from Ulsterman and his fake insider.
That'll never happen. This guy unwittingly has following to see what's the next episode will be.
Who can be trusted in the MSM that wouldn't quash it. We have no idea how much info the NYtimes is holding. I printed some of the pages to share with a friend of mine, the only thing she thought amazing about the whole thing is that ulsterman would choose an Irish name. It's great reading; stuff that intrigue and romance novels are made of. Time will tell what was real and made up from the daily news cycle.
I admit to not reading the article, I am going by the headline. (I refuse to give the Irish Welshman a fraction of a penny.) Anyone of us could have written this article based on what we have known for almost forever. Michelle did not make any serious decision regarding her relationship with the boy-child until he met Valerie Jarret. The three had dinner and a close friendship as born.
Valerie and Obama became friends and she is now his closest advisor. It is said he does nothing until he consults her.
We know he is lazy. Who else is going to handle the boring details? The only thing the Irish Welshman has is the desire to spin a yarn to pass for truth,which really makes me angry because it is no different that bubba pointing his finger saying he did not have sex with 'that woman.' My opinion is the the Irish Welshman is playing us for fools.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.