It’s possible that an insider would come out and say these things, but they wouldn’t say them to an unknown blogger with no credibility who doesn’t even have editorial access to the website they post on. Ulsterman has to send Triond a request to move his articles if they get published on the wrong website. What happens if the insider wants something pulled? Ulsterman can’t delete his own content, he can only request for it to be deleted if he has a legitimate reason, and Triond reserves the rights to suspend or terminate your account and keep your content for whatever reason they want.
That’s not exactly a breeding ground for a serious White House expose.
If there were an insider, they would be very careful to get the information to a top notch source already held in high esteem within the field of journalism. And they’d be awfully careful about what they did and didn’t say. They wouldn’t reveal secrets “on a dare.” Just add it all up and the whole thing is absurd.
The great thing about blogs is that anybody can get attention for writing a story. The bad thing about blogs is ANYBODY can get attention for writing a story. And it’s long past the time when people should have turned their heads away from Ulsterman and his fake insider.
That'll never happen. This guy unwittingly has following to see what's the next episode will be.
Who can be trusted in the MSM that wouldn't quash it. We have no idea how much info the NYtimes is holding. I printed some of the pages to share with a friend of mine, the only thing she thought amazing about the whole thing is that ulsterman would choose an Irish name. It's great reading; stuff that intrigue and romance novels are made of. Time will tell what was real and made up from the daily news cycle.