Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Gargantua; neverdem

>>When the Constitution was written, “well regulated” meant “well provisioned.”

Actually, the explanation below rings most true to me. From my FR profile page:

The term “regulated” applied to clocks means “accurate in keeping time”. It made sense, particularly in 18th Century armies, to have to pay a lot of attention to how well soldiers could operate in massed formations. Soldiers had to be drilled to load, aim, and fire as one unit. You do NOT want the rifle next to you to be firing (and emitting a shower of sparks) while you are pouring gunpowder into your musket. Everybody had to do every step together with no screwups.


26 posted on 12/17/2010 5:49:12 AM PST by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: FreedomPoster
That's truly wonderful, but that doesn't change the FACT that, when the Constitution was written, “well regulated” meant “well provisioned.”

The Constitution really says, "The presence of a well-stocked militia being necessary to guarantee a free and prosperous people, the right of the people to keep and carry weapons shall not be infringed."

As long as it's a law abiding citizen, he can have chain-guns, rocket-propelled grenades, heat-seeking missiles, suitcase nukes, Abrahms Tanks, whatever he wants to own, maintain and use to stay safe and free.

Period. That's what the Constitution says.

8^D

32 posted on 12/17/2010 6:47:19 AM PST by Gargantua (Palin ~ Bachmann 2012... cuz "Pa-Bach's a bitch!" (if you're a Liberal or a PDS snart))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: FreedomPoster
"The term “regulated” applied to clocks means “accurate in keeping time”. It made sense, particularly in 18th Century armies, to have to pay a lot of attention to how well soldiers could operate in massed formations."

This would be a fine interpretation if the 2A were talking about the need for regular practice in mass formations. But it doesn't, and your explanation bears no relationship to the other language of the 2A. The need for well coordinated mass formations being being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed? This rings "most true" to you? Really?
51 posted on 12/18/2010 6:05:23 AM PST by Bellows
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson