“I suppose whoever is above Lind is just as corruptible as she is. It’s probably useless to expect justice.”
Or, Lind was correct in her application of the law rather than corrupt.
And possibly there is the point to consider: Not getting the result you personally wanted doesn’t make the result unjust.
I don’t care what results I get. The facts are the facts.
There are 4 legal documents that directly contradict Lind’s ruling.
Does that make no difference to you?