Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: OldDeckHand
Of course, he can raise any issue he wishes (as a practical matter). However, that doesn't mean ACCA will find such an argument persuasive.

Right but it is an in to the appeal. It is a hail mary pass unless new evidence comes to light. Actually, they can bring anything up but likely ignored. However, the big picture is about Obama's eligibility and proving Obama ineligibility would help clear Lakin's name.

605 posted on 12/17/2010 1:35:02 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 602 | View Replies ]


To: Red Steel

Where can I send the evidence and have it qualify as “new evidence”? Who do I need to talk to, and how? It would be new evidence if the court hasn’t received the evidence that the HDOH has made a statutory admission that Obama’s BC is amended and that they thus have no legally valid BC for him, and that they have indirectly confirmed in 3 different ways that the Factcheck COLB is a forgery.

The fact that even his age remains legally undeterminable without the HI BC being presented as evidence should speak to the issue of whether he met the 20th Amendment requirement of “qualifying” before being allowed to “act as President” - and the orders down the chain of command can’t be “contrary to the Constitution” in order to meet the “lawfulness” criteria for Article 92(1).

So that, for instance, if the President had not taken the oath office and could not therefore execute the duties of the office, then any orders he gave before taking the oath of office would not be lawful. If he had ordered the surge at 12:01pm on Jan 20th but didn’t take the oath until 12:05, the orders for the surge all down the chain of command would be unlawful according to the criteria of Article 92(1).

In similar fashion, if he ordered the surge at 12:01 on Jan 20th but hadn’t qualified until (never, still waiting....) the authorization for the surge would be unlawful and all the orders implementing it as well.

If they’d like evidence regarding the falsification of historical documents (newspaper microfilms) in 5 different libraries throughout the country I’d be happy to give them that too. Shows the deception involved to cover up for him, which wouldn’t be necessary if there was no problem with his documents.

And I’d be happy to give them what I’ve got concerning Nancy Pelosi most probably perjuring herself to sign the certifications of nomination by which Obama got onto the ballots in every state.


610 posted on 12/17/2010 1:53:57 PM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 605 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson