Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr Rogers

He never said that about his deployment orders, if I’m understanding correctly. He pleaded not guilty to that.


208 posted on 12/16/2010 3:25:21 PM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies ]


To: butterdezillion

He pleaded not guilty to missing movement on the basis that he had not been ordered to take that specific mode of transport. He was not charged with not deploying.

“But she wouldn’t allow Lakin to show any evidence that Obama is not Constitutionally able to “act as President”.”

And since all 50 states allowed Obama on the ballot, and a majority of voters voted for him, and the Electoral College voted for him, and Congress accepted the results without any dissent, and the Supreme Court swore Obama in as President, he IS THE PRESIDENT until someone with constitutional authority (Congress) acts to remove him.

THAT is why the birth certificate was irrelevant. Nothing on the birth certificate could impact the legality of the orders already given. At best, it could give cause to Congress to remove Obama, and THEN any subsequent orders would be illegal. But that would not make the orders already given to Lakin illegal, any more than it would repeal Obamacare.


217 posted on 12/16/2010 3:33:03 PM PST by Mr Rogers (Poor history is better than good fiction, and anything with lots of horses is better still)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson