Pubbies dont want no competition..lol!
Gay activist websites trashed Christine O'Donnell and that's good enough for Palladin.
Hey Palladin!
I saw Dane. Then I saw Willie Green.
Now I see you.
This is yet another back stab by RINO’s against the Tea Party. We can forgive but must never forget.
Good to know. I don’t know how many times I saw that info repeated.
LOL...what a funny story...
Too bad her receipts don’t reflect this new story.
The receipts—and her statements—and what we all know—show that she played some funny games.
So imagine my surprise, when I visited my friend Christine after the election at the famous townhouse condo. Er, condos — there are two of them!
We should have expected the Delaware news media and national news media to be completely incompetent in mis-reporting this information.
The reason the O’Donnell campaign paid “half” the rent is because 1 of 2 townhouses is 100% dedicated to office space and the other townhouse is living space. There were and are TWO (2) completely different townhouses.
But both condos were contracted through the same realtor in one single contract. So “half” the rent means ONE (1) of the TWO (2) completely different townhouses.
Christine O’Donnell’s campaign paid for the townhouse used 100% completely and separately for NOTHING but office space. For convenience, the two townhouses are next door to each other. But they do not connect.
The townhouse (condo) used for living space was the half NOT paid for by the campaign.
Did she have the media in to walk thru the rooms and video everything?
Why not?
There is insufficient evidence to make a judgement here.
When were the complaints made about her getting half her rent? It sounds like it was a complaint from the 2008 campaign by the short-lived 2008 campaign manager.
But when was the visit made to the townhouses? After this current election? How do we know that the situation didn’t change?
We could know, since the story talks about paperwork, rental agreements, and the like — if we SAW The paperwork, we could see when the two townhomes being discussed now were rented.
But I’m not sure what the point is. We already knew that it was legal for her to have the campaign pay half, whether there were one or two townhomes. People set up offices in their homes all the time, and that is a valid way of running a campaign. What difference does it make whether they offices are in the same home, or next door? It’s like a solution searching for a problem.
It also seems that if this explanation was available, the campaign would have used it, rather than all the explanations they did use. I would note that this story is from someone who visited the home, not from the campaign.
The Democrats, the media and the entire popular culture industries went after Christine and Sharon Angle full time and with every toxic weapon they could muster. Anyone who blames either of these women for the loss of their Senate seat, is part of the problem.