When you all stop the animous to other candidates and quit savaging a good conservative like Duncan Hunter who is probably not running, to get back at pissant because he would prefer someone other than Palin, I will stop.
So far all I see is name calling, accusations, comments that are childish and foul(think factmart) and covering up the least positive aspects of a candidates record.
We could be fair and give mulligans to all of them. They would all appear much better if we do that. Then we could all get along. Funny, when I knock Daniels or any other candidate for their record, no one gets nasty. Odd ain’t it?
I won’t take back the fact that Palin did set up that committee on climate change. Cerbon trading was one of the goals. I know this was in 2007, so maybe she has changed her tune since then. I also have said here before that their is no evidence that she agreed it was man caused.
I would ping the person I talked about, but I was told that was no longer necessary. Or maybe it is for some people, but not everyone.
Let's get this straight, and you can check if you like, I have no animus to any candidates right now other than Mitt and Ron Paul. I think they are horrendous examples for the party, non conservatives who deserve lots of criticism. I've said dozens of times I like Hunter and have no particular bone to pick with him.
It's his representative here, one self described (aptly) pissant that I find despicable and disgusting.
You can try to defend him if you like, frankly what he does is indefensible. He's deceitful, dishonest, deranged, despicable and frankly, disgusting. You are upset by name calling? Why don't you ask him to stop, he seems to me the grand champion of name callers. He can't post an article or come on a thread without name calling. He never engages in debate, never deals with good answers to his objections, constantly moves the goal posts of any discussion, and yet you have no problem with him.....
Hint: It's not because he prefers someone else to Palin that he's disliked, it's for all the reasons I just mentioned. It's because he can't and won't engage, because he is so dishonest and disrespectful that he now gets all that thrown back in his face.
Frankly, he's so unhinged I think he likes being the troll that he is.
If you want to defend him and join him go right ahead.
My original post to you suggested two things:
1. That it was a correct thing to wait and see what DeMint did yesterday as he deserved the benefit of finding out why he changed tactics.
2. I also suggested you might want to curb your animus towards Sarah Palin and work to ending a common and true enemy, the Obamacrats.
You might want to rethink how you responded to that.