Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

LIVE THREAD - House Debating and Voting 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' Repeal NOW
Interactive Fox News ^ | 12/15/2010

Posted on 12/15/2010 2:21:51 PM PST by Lazamataz

Watch live

(Excerpt) Read more at interactive.foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: dadt; downourthroats; gaypresident; homosexualagenda; lameduckcongress; pelosicongress; reidsenate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last
To: SecondAmendment

No it won’t put anyone over the edge. The only thing that gets people riled up is the loss of money.


41 posted on 12/15/2010 3:10:53 PM PST by huldah1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: JPG; Pride in the USA; Stillwaters
Just like Saddam Hussein, the rats are going to torch all the wells before they're forced out of Dodge

Very well said.

42 posted on 12/15/2010 3:13:03 PM PST by lonevoice (Where the Welfare State is on the march, the Police State is not far behind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: animal172

Yeah? How the hell does that work on the battlefield?

How does that work when you get splattered with the blood and brains of the soldier standing next to you, as his head explodes from a 50 cal rifle round?

How does that work when your lying on the field, wounded, and you need plasma or some other blood product. Are we now going to keep seperate supplies... one for the turd burglarin butt pirates, and one for the normal folk?

Will the faggots get their own personlal medics too?


43 posted on 12/15/2010 3:17:02 PM PST by TCH (DON'T BE AN "O-HOLE"! ... DEMAND YOUR STATE ENACT ITS SOVEREIGNTY !When a majority of the American)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: luv2ndamend

My dad, who was a WWII combat veteran, said that there were some homosexuals who entered basic training but that they washed out because they simply could not hack it. If there were some who did stick with it did not hit on hardened combat veterans if they wanted to survive. He said that he did not know of any who stuck with it. Combat is not a day at the Gay Parade foolishness. - This is a recipe for TROUBLE.


44 posted on 12/15/2010 3:18:11 PM PST by Twinkie (Doing nothing is the most tiring job there is; you can't quit and rest . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
I bet it's a done deal on the House. On the Senate, not so much.

As expected.

45 posted on 12/15/2010 3:24:10 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

When it’s time to round up rat traitors and ship them one-way to North Korea, I’d like the 1st Marine Division to do it. Then again, the 2nd MarDiv is closer. Maybe the 2nd can head up I-95, while the 1st makes a beach landing.


46 posted on 12/15/2010 3:28:05 PM PST by sergeantdave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Twinkie

I’m sure I served with some homos.

As has been pointed out many times, they ARE serving. The whole “I must tell you I’m gay and you have to like it” thing is to undermine morale, nothing more.

Traditional values, tear down that wall, brick by brick.


47 posted on 12/15/2010 3:30:53 PM PST by hattend (The meaning of the 2010 election was rebuke, reject, and repeal. - Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: animal172
If this passes, seperate barracks for straight women, straight men, lesbians and backside pounders. Anything short of that will not work.

The DoD recommendation based on the "survey" study is to not change anything related to barracks, showers, bathrooms, bunks, etc. as it would be too expensive and impossible to implement. So now we can desegregate men's and women's facilities for the same reason? Insanity!

48 posted on 12/15/2010 3:34:49 PM PST by fwdude (Anita Bryant was right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Does anyone know who the “Republicans” (RINO’s) were who voted for this?


49 posted on 12/15/2010 3:36:25 PM PST by fwdude (Anita Bryant was right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hattend

The stepwise destruction of the honor in the military had a hallmark in the original DADT law, because that in effect proclaimed that so long as a sexual degenerate could fool everyone and maintain a lie, then that sexual degenerate could serve honorably. Think about it, the basis of DADT under a sexual degenerate president was designed to immediately make a mockery of the honesty and integrity of those in the military by protecting those who would maintain a dishonorbale lie to fool their fellow soldiers and officers!


50 posted on 12/15/2010 3:36:49 PM PST by MHGinTN (Some, believing they can't be deceived, it's nigh impossible to convince them when they're deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

I’d be willing to bet that 90%+ of the Dems and 70%+ of the Pubs in Congress never served in the military (ROTC doesn’t count). They are voting on shit that they have no clue about.

But then, I guess I could say that about any legislation


51 posted on 12/15/2010 3:38:44 PM PST by hattend (The meaning of the 2010 election was rebuke, reject, and repeal. - Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Any Dems vote no?


52 posted on 12/15/2010 3:39:20 PM PST by hattend (The meaning of the 2010 election was rebuke, reject, and repeal. - Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

Agreed. I was in the AF when DADT came up. It was hosing up morale then.

Even worse now.


53 posted on 12/15/2010 3:43:21 PM PST by hattend (The meaning of the 2010 election was rebuke, reject, and repeal. - Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Racehorse
Joe Lieberman (I-CT) and Susan Collins (R-ME) are reported as saying they have the votes to repeal DADT.

They also said this about the repeal when it was attached to the Defense Authorization bill.

EVERYONE READING HERE NEEDS TO POUND ON THEIR SENATORS' DESKS, RING THEIR PHONES OFF THE HOOK AND FAX/EMAIL LIKE MAD NOW - ESPECIALLY THOSE WITH SENATORS ON THE FENCE.

54 posted on 12/15/2010 3:45:10 PM PST by fwdude (Anita Bryant was right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

Well, you know, they saw that shower scene in Starship Troopers and thought wouldn’t that be great...


55 posted on 12/15/2010 3:45:44 PM PST by ConjunctionJunction
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: traditional1

I hope all the incoming Representatives of the People understood the message of the last election and are aware that they hold the purse strings and can and will (if they value their seats and their principles) withhold all funding for the enemy’s pet lame duck projects and give No Quarter during the 112th.


56 posted on 12/15/2010 3:50:17 PM PST by Postman (112th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

The fix was in. GOP should never have budged on the bad tax bill that gave out another 13 months for unemployment payments.

Now the Rats (in the MOST ETHICAL CONGRESS IN ALL OF HISTORY) are shoving through sweeping changes they can’t be held accountable for.

GOP should have kept the legislation logjammed.


57 posted on 12/15/2010 3:56:21 PM PST by a fool in paradise (The establishment clause isn't just against my OWN government establishing state religion in America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

Gays will be promoted for being gay?


58 posted on 12/15/2010 3:59:25 PM PST by FreedBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: FreedBird

Would you like that?


59 posted on 12/15/2010 4:07:49 PM PST by MHGinTN (Some, believing they can't be deceived, it's nigh impossible to convince them when they're deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

don’t support it, but how can it be stopped? If a gay wants to promote a gay in the military, how will it be challenged?


60 posted on 12/15/2010 4:17:47 PM PST by FreedBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson