The sun will be decreasing in activity over the coming decades.
Posted on 12/15/2010 10:45:27 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
The cold now sweeping over Europe and other parts of the globe are due to natural cycles, says German meteorologist Thomas Globig. He points out that the first 2 weeks of December in Britain have been the coldest since the last little ice age 350 years ago, and claims some climate models have criminally under-estimated solar influence on climate and that we ought to expect colder winters, and expanding Arctic ice in the years ahead.
“Some climate forecasts will have to be thrown in the dustbin.”
All the talk and hype among the clueless masses have been, and still is, about global warming due to human emissions of CO2. Will the temperature rise be 2°C, 4°C or 10°C? Will we be able to avert the climate catastrophe?
Yes, it all sounds like a really bad B-rated movie. But it’s not – it’s all junk science produced by green activists. Ignore it. Dr Benny Peiser here brings our attention to an essay posted at wetter.t-online.de here.
The talk of this essay is not about warming, but of drastic cooling. According to wetter.info:
‘The year 2010 will be the coldest in ten years for Germany,’ says Thomas Globig of the Meteomedia weather service in a discussion with wetter.info.
Now it’s sure: temperatures in Germany this year have averaged 8.1 °C, or 0.2°C below the long-term measured average of 8.3°C. ‘I’m afraid that by the end of the year, we are going to end up much lower,’ says Globig.”
Us sceptics know that climate goes in cycles. Back in the 60s and 70s Europe got a lot of snow. Then it got milder – due to man-made global warming! – all the government funded scientists opportunistically chimed in. But lo and behold, it’s getting colder again. People have been caught off guard says Globig.
The sun will be decreasing in activity over the coming decades.
Why is it getting cooler?
Globig attributes it to natural cycles: mainly the large-scale changes in the air flow over the Atlantic and fluctuating solar activity. There are Lows near the Azores and Highs in the North Atlantic, which means cold Arctic air is getting pumped down across Europe. “The weather situation has been turned up on its head,” says Globig.
Oh – but this is all due to man’s disruption of the weather, the alarmists will tell you. It’s actually abnormal! Not so, says Globig:
This change in the so-called North Atlantic Oscillation is completely normal - only that they are difficult to forecast in detail.’ With storm Kyrill in 2007, it was the peak of air mass flow from the warmer Atlantic into the European region.
Globig points out:
Since then, the weather over the Atlantic has gotten calmer.”
Calmer weather over the Atlantic? Time for the climatologists to bring their crystal balls in for a major recalibration. Their crackpot models predicted just the opposite.
The NAO has switched. That means we ought to expect more cold winters in the years ahead. That’s right – forget warming. Ignore all the morons in the mainstream media.
These low temperatures could continue for a few years, maybe decades. Even icier winters can’t be ruled out. ‘This has occurred before in the past, and has to do with natural climate changes,’ says Globig. We could even be at the start of a little ice age, ‘the probability is there.’
It has to do with solar activity, according to wetter-t-online.de:
It has gone past its high point of its 200-year high-phase and will decrease over the coming decades. Around the year 2040/2050, scientists calculate there will be a new so-called solar minimum, that means much less feed-in of solar energy into the Earth’s atmosphere.
And when that happens, it means colder times ahead. And that means colder poles, which means expanding Arctic ice. Like Joe Bastardi, and probaly hundreds, if not thousands, of meteorologists, Globig thinks so too.
‘I find it quite plausible that Arctic ice will expand considerably over the next year,’ says Globig. ‘The influence of solar activity on climate has been criminally under-estimated.’
’We will really know what is in store for us in the next five to seven years,’ Globig believes. Indeed one thing appears to be very probable for meteorologists: ‘We will have to throw some climate forecasts into the dustbin.’
Today, I can practically tell who gets their longterm forecasts from whom. I went to a home & garden center today to buy a snow shovel – they were all sold out. The next shipment? At the end of January! How much worse can you get?
Tomorrow I will call the headquarters of this home & garden center to see if I can find out where they are getting their forecasts. I’ll bet you they are getting them from the warmist DWD German Weather Service.
==========================================================
Update: Let’s throw this in, too! http://www.populartechnology.net/2010/12/1000-references-of-global-cooling.html (h/t Climate Scam)
Propaganda doesn’t have to match reality!
Funny thing is, calling electromagnetic energy a wave implies it is moving in something. Just of one those things that don’t make sense quite yet.
In fact, the only you can count on is what 'weather' you can personally feel/see/experienc or correctly remember - NOTHING ELSE. All else is horseshit.
Well...you must be warned...see #59.
..and it's tracking toward the Bay Area and Sierra this weekend..
and unsettled is in forecast for all next week to boot..
Them ski resorts are gonna be packed,,
if folks can get to them..
Global Eruption Rocks the Sun ( August 2010— Must See Video )
—
for some reason, Carole King came to mind when IO saw that title.. mon apologie in advance
I feeeel the earth move
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hoHuxpa4h48
Hey ...that is right up there with my Favorite by Tennessee Ernie Ford...29 Tons of Coal and what do you get?
That's a good example, I'll have to remember to use it. The only problem with it is that many warmists are so ignorant of science, that they probably have no idea about what you're talking about — or, they still believe in the aether theory. (Consider the petition to ban H20, signed by many at the Cancun gabfest.)
I sometimes ask whether the warmist can name a scientific breakthrough. Then, I point out that it was a breakthrough, because it disproved the previous scientific consensus. I also add that every single scientific advancement has come at the expense of the previous scientific consensus.
“CONSENSUS IS NOT PROOF”
Exactly. I have often said that anyone who uses the term “scientific consensus”, as if it were proof of something, is completely ignorant of science. If you hear that argument used, you don't have to know anything more about your interlocutor. He's either an ignoramus, or duplicitous.
Only if you confuse electromagnetic radiation with sound waves. Sound waves require a material medium, electromagnetic radiation does just fine in a vacuum.
All I can say is - Thank Gaia for Global Warming - if it weren’t for GW it would be even colder than it is now - colder than a witches left tit in a brass brassiere.
At which point one politely calls them an idiot and walks away...:-)
“Hey ...that is right up there with my Favorite by Tennessee Ernie Ford...29 Tons of Coal and what do you get?”
_______________________________________________________
Sixteen tons. It’s government accounting :0)
Senior memory!
Inflation.
Inflation, and conflation converting first to metric units, then back again.
Liberal math.
Duh. I don’t like cold.
Interesting. Another thing to add to that is when the outer atmosphere cools substantially, it has more variability in external warming events, the best example being bursts of galactic cosmic rays which are uneven. Some solar effects are uneven as well. In any case the sharp temperature contrasts in the stratosphere create extreme large scale weather patterns in the troposphere. So we end up with extreme highs and deep upper lows. We are seeing those now since solar activity is relatively low and thus not blocking the GCRs.
The super salty water drives the current by sinking. It doesn't really matter how much ice melts, only how much freezes each year. Right now with extremely negative NAO and AO (or temps of -20F instead of -30F) there won't be as much Arctic ice created, but probably plenty to keep the current going.
And that is the odd thing. They do act like waves, but in truth are not.
And that is the odd thing. They do act like waves, but in truth are not.
Look, both the particle - photon - and wave models of electromagnetic radiation are valid and accepted. Read up on the ‘wave-particle duality’. This is basic quantum mechanics. Sheesh!
Or what novel ‘truth’ are you talking about?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.