Skip to comments.
One Republican, Unhappy With His Party's Position on Carbon, Prepares a New Agenda (RINO ALERT)
The New York Times ^
| 2010-12-15
| Evan Lehmann
Posted on 12/14/2010 11:27:15 PM PST by rabscuttle385
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
To: rabscuttle385
Sen. Lindsey Graham is concerned that the Republican Party faces political dangers by resisting efforts to reduce carbon dioxide and other air pollution. Somebody should ask Senator Graham why he hates trees.
He seems intent on starving them.
21
posted on
12/15/2010 1:52:45 AM PST
by
okie01
(THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
To: okie01
To: rabscuttle385
We can reduce the amount of carbon dioxide significantly if these two would stop breathing.
23
posted on
12/15/2010 2:02:39 AM PST
by
NTHockey
(Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners)
To: Ev Reeman
“The Obama Administration is also toying with a plan to substitute administrative regulations for treaties. Several years ago”
In 1993 the Senate backed away from ratifying the UN'S radical Convention on Biological Diversity. Clinton used executive orders to and statutory powers already in place to implement the provisions of this treaty.
Do some research on Sustainable Development, Smart Growth and Agenda 21. All government policy today, all right from a treaty that the U.S. Senate would not even vote on.
24
posted on
12/15/2010 2:14:57 AM PST
by
Captain7seas
(FIRE JANE LUBCHENCO FROM NOAA)
To: rabscuttle385
I do not know why South Carolina puts up with this POS
RINO politician.
He is, without a doubt, about as low as they come.
25
posted on
12/15/2010 2:21:29 AM PST
by
AlexW
To: rabscuttle385
Can we replace her, PLEASE?
To: steelyourfaith; Ernest_at_the_Beach
27
posted on
12/15/2010 3:54:15 AM PST
by
Beowulf
To: rabscuttle385
28
posted on
12/15/2010 4:23:04 AM PST
by
mirkwood
(Palin-Bolton 2012)
To: rabscuttle385
LOL. The lower left caption should read: DEATH.
CO2 is the stuff of life, morons.
29
posted on
12/15/2010 4:33:12 AM PST
by
1010RD
(First Do No Harm)
To: Beowulf; meyer; Normandy; Whenifhow; TenthAmendmentChampion; Clive; scripter; Darnright; WL-law; ...
30
posted on
12/15/2010 4:33:45 AM PST
by
steelyourfaith
(ObamaCare Death Panels: a Final Solution to the looming Social Security crisis ?)
To: Ev Reeman
"EPAs aggressive overregulation is forcing the electric industry to choose between continuing to operate while taking on major capital costs of complying with heavy new burdens, or closing down and building new plants that use more expensive sources such as natural gas." I think you will find that natural gas is not any longer a "more expensive source". Development of horizontal drilling and its benefit of making shale gas practical have changed the equation significantly. If a fossil fuel is used, natural gas is the best choice.
To: rabscuttle385
They make Forest Gump look like a genius.
To: rabscuttle385
Obviously Ms Lindsey, you have heavily invested in carbon credits...IDIOT!
Don't you realize there is a lot of shuttin up to be done? And you are just the one to do it.
33
posted on
12/15/2010 5:23:01 AM PST
by
ROCKLOBSTER
(Celebrate Republicans Freed the Slaves Month)
To: Ev Reeman
Graham and Gingrich are so close o the forest they cannot see the trees.
34
posted on
12/15/2010 5:23:43 AM PST
by
chainsaw
( 'You know that your landing gear is up and locked when it takes full power to taxi to the terminal)
To: rabscuttle385
Gramnisty is history in 12
35
posted on
12/15/2010 5:29:24 AM PST
by
G-Man 1
(-- get)
To: ROCKLOBSTER
Yep, Lindsey,
36
posted on
12/15/2010 5:34:56 AM PST
by
MrB
(The difference between a (de)humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
To: Ev Reeman
Great article by Phyllis Schlafly. It shows the problem with all those lovely agencies under the executive branch - EPA, FDA, DHS, Dept of Education, etc. If congress had any spine, they would cut all their funding by 90%!
37
posted on
12/15/2010 5:35:59 AM PST
by
algernonpj
(He who pays the piper . . .)
To: rabscuttle385
"Sen. Lindsey Graham is concerned that the Republican Party faces political dangers by resisting efforts to reduce carbon dioxide and other air pollution."
Graham is no RINO...I don't understand how he can be so concerned that the Republican Party faces political dangers for not buying into a shakedown socialistic agenda on worldwide scale?!
I tell ya', the Republican Party had best start focusing on what is best for United States of America and stop cowering to the left's corrupt and atheistic socialist intentions, or they will absolutely be facing political dangers...of extinction.
Look at this record and tell me where you see a RINO?
Graham OnTheIssues
38
posted on
12/15/2010 5:48:34 AM PST
by
jacknhoo
(Luke 12:51. Think ye, that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, no; but separation.)
To: jacknhoo
GOOBER and his pro amnesty stances taken with McLAME.
This CARBON Bull****
Looks like a RINO to me ... Or ..
we can just put him in the same category as RON PAUL...
Looks good on paper but they’re still KOOKS!!!
39
posted on
12/15/2010 6:51:52 AM PST
by
gwilhelm56
(Mr. Al NotSoSharp... your RACE CARD has been Declined...it's Over the LIMIT!!)
To: Wonder Warthog
“I think you will find that natural gas is not any longer a “more expensive source”. Development of horizontal drilling and its benefit of making shale gas practical have changed the equation significantly. If a fossil fuel is used, natural gas is the best choice.”
The government is trying to regulate coal fired power plants out of business. If natural gas is cheaper then let the market decide. It is a matter of supply and demand. At current usage rates this country has several hundred years of coal that can be extracted economically from the ground.
Where I live we had an electric generation plant that our public utilities spent around a hundred million dollars trying to comply with EPA regulations. It was designed to burn garbage, wood chips, and other solid fuel. The EPA classified it as an incinerator not a power generation plant and pulled it’s license. The whole place was dismantled. I used to work next door to it. It burned the fuel at such a high temperature and had so many filters for particulate that you couldn’t even tell when it was running... there was no visible “polution” at all. They were turning garbage into electricity and the EPA shut them down.
40
posted on
12/15/2010 7:52:41 AM PST
by
fireman15
(Check your facts before making ignorant statements.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson