Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Business-as-usual behavior Republicans told Tea Party voters they wouldn't engage in
Fox News ^ | just now | Fox News

Posted on 12/14/2010 1:30:18 PM PST by jessduntno

"This is precisely the business-as-usual behavior that Republicans told Tea Party voters they wouldn't engage in.''

-- Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) before casting a grudging vote for a tax compromise struck between his party and President Obama.

The Senate advanced the tax deal struck between President Obama and the GOP with an astonishing 83 votes. You couldn't get that many votes for a resolution in favor of Santa Claus.

But a tougher fight now lies ahead on a $1 trillion plan to fund the government for the next year.

The tax deal vote was a cannon shot over the bow of House Democrats. A piece of legislation with this kind of broad, bipartisan support isn't supposed to be tweaked, it's supposed to be ratified by acclamation.

And while House Democrats are still grousing about President Obama caving in too soon to Republican demands on the extension of all current tax rates, the third of the $900 billion plan that is either new spending or tax incentives looks pretty good to Democrats as the reality of a GOP House majority draws nearer.

Plus, a Democratic revolt in the House might permanently hamstring Obama. If Obama cannot speak for his party in Washington when negotiating with Republicans, he's already a lame duck.

But now comes the harder part.

The House, which failed for the first time in 36 years to even offer a budget, has offered up a $1.1 trillion spending package to cover the next year. Senate Democrats have a similar $1 trillion measure.

(Excerpt) Read more at politics.blogs.foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last
To: KarlInOhio

This is precisely the business-as-usual behavior that Republicans told Tea Party voters they wouldn’t engage in.’’


And then he went and voted for it ,in effect saying F-you to the Tea party voters.


41 posted on 12/14/2010 2:39:53 PM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: moovova

I’d say we just defeat the bad Republicans with Tea Party approved Republicans.


42 posted on 12/14/2010 2:50:58 PM PST by truthfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: moovova

I’d say we just defeat the bad Republicans with Tea Party approved Republicans.


43 posted on 12/14/2010 2:53:19 PM PST by truthfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: moovova

I’d say we just defeat the bad Republicans with Tea Party approved Republicans.


44 posted on 12/14/2010 2:56:18 PM PST by truthfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: truthfreedom

Sure, I’ll JUST snap my fingers


45 posted on 12/14/2010 2:56:24 PM PST by Java4Jay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Revel

Sarah Palin didn’t get John McCain re-elected senator from Arizona... John McCain controls the AZ GOP and it was always a huge uphill for JD who, as it turned out, was a terrible candidate... who also had very little money to wage an effective campaign.


46 posted on 12/14/2010 3:01:49 PM PST by Arizona Carolyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: moovova

Like that will do anything but benefit the Democratic Party.


47 posted on 12/14/2010 3:02:42 PM PST by Arizona Carolyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Java4Jay

sorry about the duplicates. my internet is working bad.

we really haven’t had too much trouble beating bad republicans in the primary.

those are victories.

we should just continue to do what we did in 2008.

there are already 3rd parties for tea party people. constitutional party, libertarian party. never win, always lose.

the tea party is working pretty well. but we’re learning that many republicans suck more than we thought.

a 3rd party could be formed by the liberal republicans. bloomburg, crist, etc.


48 posted on 12/14/2010 3:36:58 PM PST by truthfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: jessduntno

What does it take to get the GOP leadership to understand that people were not voting for Republicans but for Conservatives? This budget bill is an abomination for those that are fiscally conservative. I realize that this is the lame duck session, but I will not forget those voted to support this budget.


49 posted on 12/14/2010 3:45:50 PM PST by Nosterrex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jessduntno

Dang... you do have a point! ;-)

LLS


50 posted on 12/14/2010 4:36:16 PM PST by LibLieSlayer (WOLVERINES!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Arizona Carolyn
Like that will do anything but benefit the Democratic Party.

LOL! You people are priceless!

Did we not just observe what the party does when we primary out its annointed candidates?  Excuse me if I don't have a hard on for party loyalty.

51 posted on 12/14/2010 7:07:26 PM PST by zeugma (Ad Majorem Dei Gloriam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Mouton
Voting has become the opium of this democracy. You do it and you get a temporary high then reality sets in and you get depressed.

Other than the fact that this is not and was never intended to be a democracy,  I agree with you wholeheartedly.  Even when you aren't offered any actual choices, because both candidates are essentially socialists with different makeup on, the process of voting has served the ruling class very well in keeping America pacified.

The motions of voting, even in the case of predertermined outcome and massive electoral fraud gives the oligarchy the fig leaf that lets people pretend that their vote actually has some small impact. If voting could actually change anything it would be illegal.

52 posted on 12/14/2010 7:08:25 PM PST by zeugma (Ad Majorem Dei Gloriam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Arizona Carolyn
Like that will do anything but benefit the Democratic Party.

Then stay snuggled up with Juan McCain.

53 posted on 12/14/2010 7:49:28 PM PST by moovova (Don't let Obama spoil the word "hope" for you...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: moovova

You suppose what you have no freaking clue about.....


54 posted on 12/14/2010 7:55:30 PM PST by Arizona Carolyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: zeugma

If you are talking about Lisa Murkowski, the problem is her and I agree the party was all squishy, but when only 1/3 of our senators are vulnerable every six years you are not going to change them in one election cycle, to think you can is niave... Personally, I think Murkowski cheated in AK to win and even if she had run on the GOP ticket and Miller as an independent the outcome wouldn’t change.


55 posted on 12/14/2010 7:58:43 PM PST by Arizona Carolyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson