Ha, ha, ha, gag!
Your most ridiculous statement yet.
Some birthers don't care who they disparage if it means keeping birtherism alive.
I have not disparaged anyone regarding chain of command, except to say that the chain of command is NOT being followed, because the head has been cut off of it.
What I HAVE done is ask this question, applying the logic the anti-Lakin folks use to a case where we have the benefit of hindsight:
Soldier A is ordered: Move the prisoners to the shower area. Soldier B is ordered: Turn on the shower. Soldier C is ordered: Remove the dead bodies from the shower area and place them in the open pit. Which of these orders was “unlawful” under the US MCM and Denise Lind’s analysis?
Nobody has even tried to touch that question. Instead, they accuse me of “disparaging” the US military.
The US military has a fantastic code, a fantastic chain of command, and a fantastic Manual for Courts-Martial - all of which would prevent the US from ever becoming the despicable mess that the German military became, IF IT WAS ALLOWED TO BE FOLLOWED. And right now there is a big battle between those who want to neuter the greatness built into our system by refusing to allow the protections we’ve been given to actually be utilized.
We are at a critical point in this nation’s history. We have communists and Islamists alike who have vowed to destroy this country from within, by infiltrating and using our own system against itself, like a flesh-eating bacteria or a slip-knot that only tightens worse when someone tries to undo it. If we don’t wake up and see the python around our neck before it’s too late, there will be no way to survive this deadly attack.
And THAT makes the hardships of the doctor who had to replace Lakin seem like small beans in the big scheme. The fact that Obama is refusing to allow light to shine on the flesh-eating bacteria tells us EXACTLY whose side he is on. Slithering snake.
“Some birthers don’t care who they disparage if it means keeping birtherism alive. “
Lt.Col. Lakin was first of all referring to his oath to the CONSTITUTION, NOT “birtherism”!
OTOH it wouldn’t be expected that a Con-Man would understands the ramification of the Nurenberg trial some six decades ago, where Nazi officers was condemned by four nation judges for following un-lawful orders, which is what has been referred to regarding the military!!
You and others are very clever in splitting words in order to protect YOUR now present dear Fuehrer in the W.H.!!!
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d0/1946-10-08_21_Nazi_Chiefs_Guilty.ogv
Go back and read post 931 and its link!!!