Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jeffrey Bell: Return America to the Gold Standard
moneynews.com ^ | December 10, 2010 | Greg Brown and Ashley Martella

Posted on 12/10/2010 6:48:02 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last
To: muir_redwoods
Not at $16/oz or $20.67/oz or $35/oz. Maybe not even at $1410/oz. However, if Potomac fever were cured, and our politicians stopped all the g*ddamn spending, then maybe we could afford the business of government at $1410/oz.
61 posted on 12/10/2010 10:59:41 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Charlie Rangel doesn't deal in average Americans. That's OK: I don't deal in crooked pols.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Pelham

I thought every dollar had to be backed by gold. Such a requirement would make inflation less likely, because without such a requirement, you could certainly print dollars with abandon (kinda like what is happening now).


62 posted on 12/10/2010 11:04:01 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Charlie Rangel doesn't deal in average Americans. That's OK: I don't deal in crooked pols.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Ramius
We have to put some kind of limit on the money supply somehow, or run the risk of this.
63 posted on 12/10/2010 11:06:52 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Charlie Rangel doesn't deal in average Americans. That's OK: I don't deal in crooked pols.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Freedom4US
Of course even this assumes that the gold, that has not been audited since Eisenhower was President, is still there, or has not been pledged, swapped, leased or sold, etc.

For all we know, the Red Chinese could be holding it as part of the collateral for all the money that they have loaned us.

64 posted on 12/10/2010 11:19:49 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Charlie Rangel doesn't deal in average Americans. That's OK: I don't deal in crooked pols.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: jiggyboy; PA Engineer; blam; TigerLikesRooster; Cheap_Hessian; CJinVA; Jet Jaguar; ...
Goldbug ping.


65 posted on 12/10/2010 11:22:51 PM PST by Jet Jaguar (*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: taxtruth
$1,410 an ounce. That is why we cannot return to the gold standard.

You would destroy the Dollar and our economy in one fell swoop.

66 posted on 12/11/2010 3:45:16 AM PST by Jimmy Valentine (DemocRATS - when they speak, they lie; when they are silent, they are stealing the American Dream)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Pelham

.....The dollar was still convertible among central banks until Nixon......

Who cut the link and quit selling gold for $35/oz because the market price was $43 and our gold was being carried off by the truck load

It is interesting this thread says the accounting valuation of the reserves is $42 or near the value on the day Nixon shut the gold window.


67 posted on 12/11/2010 4:45:04 AM PST by bert (K.E. N.P. N.C. D.E. +12 .....( History is a process, not an event ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

I have always been hesitant to buy things of great value on e-bay. Besides dealers, are there any other venues (clubs) where one can buy precious metals directly and in person from individuals thus bypassing the middleman?


68 posted on 12/11/2010 8:49:38 AM PST by grumpygresh (Democrats delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar

Nice image. Do you have one of the flip side?


69 posted on 12/11/2010 9:37:27 AM PST by goldbux (When yer odd, the odds are with you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: goldbux

https://www.theworldreserve.com/images/details/CUR50BNUG.jpg

Click the URL. I cannot post the image.


70 posted on 12/11/2010 4:56:14 PM PST by Jet Jaguar (*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

“I thought every dollar had to be backed by gold. “

That’s a common misconception. Every dollar must be convertible to gold upon demand, but that’s not the same as having gold back each dollar in existence. The monetary base is gold under a gold standard, with a structure of credit money built on top of it. The growth of that credit money is restrained by the fact that it can be redeemed for gold, which is likely to occur when the public thinks that an excessive number of dollars have been created. As long as there isn’t an excessive issue of credit money people are content to keep their savings in dollars rather than gold. You can see that process in action today.


71 posted on 12/11/2010 7:38:47 PM PST by Pelham (Islam, the mortal enemy of the free world)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Freedom4US

“You must have missed my question - given the framers disastrous experience with paper currencies fresh in their minds when they wrote the constitution and bill of rights, the legislation requiring gold and silver to be the only lawful money, etc., &c, don’t you think it a bit queer that Roosevelt got away with that? “

Not really. Lincoln suspended the gold standard and issued an enormous amount of fiat currency during the Civil War, the greenbacks of the US Notes series. The gold standard didn’t return for 17 years.


72 posted on 12/11/2010 7:46:26 PM PST by Pelham (Islam, the mortal enemy of the free world)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Freedom4US

The vast majority of Americans didn’t have one gold coin to turn in. The average household income of that era was, prior to the hard years of the Depression, less than $2,000 per year. Gold coins were largely held by banks as part of their reserves.

“For my part, there may be good reasons to do, or not do, certain things but why the secrecy and pseudo-legal mumbo jumbo?”

I don’t know that there was any secrecy about it. I think that idea comes mostly from the tales of modern conspiracy fans. The legal issue came from those who had gold clauses in their contracts and who didn’t want to be paid in cheaper dollars. But that was a moot issue since during the Depression dollars were much harder than before, not cheaper. Gold remained the monetary base. But revaluing it while it was still in circulation would have given a 30% windfall to the tiny minority who held gold, and this would likely have been extremely unpopular considering the desperate conditions of that time. Whether that was the proper thing to do you’ll have to decide. I’m just trying to describe it, not judge it.


73 posted on 12/11/2010 8:09:15 PM PST by Pelham (Islam, the mortal enemy of the free world)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Freedom4US

There’s plenty of Supreme Court decisions that I dislike but I haven’t noticed that my dissenting opinion has made them see the error of their ways even once.

The reasoning of the Supreme Court in 1935 is that the Constitution grants Congress the power to regulate the monetary system and abrogating the private ownership of gold falls within this power. Google “gold clause cases” and you can find plenty to read about the issue.


74 posted on 12/11/2010 8:29:28 PM PST by Pelham (Islam, the mortal enemy of the free world)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: bert

The market price had become $43 because neither Kennedy nor Johnson nor Nixon was willing to address Triffin’s Dilemma, which would have required an American recession and replacing the dollar as the world’s reserve currency. It was primarily the French who were cashing in their dollar holdings for gold.


75 posted on 12/11/2010 8:34:22 PM PST by Pelham (Islam, the mortal enemy of the free world)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar

Ok, thanks. Added it to our collection.


76 posted on 12/11/2010 9:11:24 PM PST by goldbux (When yer odd, the odds are with you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Ghotier
You have to be a graduate of one of those grand ivied establishments of higher bloviation who still fail to realize that no matter how hard you rub, you can't polish a turd. Please tell me ONE fiat currency in the history of the world that has worked. Most have lasted about 40 years. Our world fiat monetary system is about that old now. The only difference is that this time it's a reserve currency. The only option the central banks of the world have is to print to infinity.

Nam Vet

77 posted on 12/11/2010 9:20:25 PM PST by Nam Vet (Are you better off than you were 4 trillion dollars ago?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
I've been reading through most of the posts and the lack of monetary history is astounding.

Since Biblical times, the price of a kilo (aprox) loaf of bread has run between about 300 and 388 loaves per ounce of gold. The latest hyperinflationary induced famine was Zimbabwe, as I'm sure you all know. You probably saw all the news stories about people panning for gold to buy bread.

If you recall the price, it was 1 tenth of a gram of gold per loaf. At 31.103 grams per troy ounce, that looks like it is about 311 loaves per ounce. Fits right into the historical norms, but at the more expensive end of the scale. The same works for housing and even the Dow Jones Industrial Average.

Stop thinking the way the media, bankers and politicians want you to think about money.

Nam Vet

78 posted on 12/11/2010 9:46:15 PM PST by Nam Vet (Are you better off than you were 4 trillion dollars ago?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pelham

It’s nor “conspiracy”, it’s all in the public record in fact and very well documented. Of course nobidy wants to be paid back in depreciated money, but that’s not news. What’s important to note is the repudiation of gold clause contracts - what you’re really talking about is the unit of account with respect to the rule of law, etc. You certainly should be able to judge that because it is a form of theft under color of law. Long term lease contracts are often 99 years. Expressed in terms of gold or some objective standard makes sense. Otherwise, inflation eats away at the currency value and end up with absurdities as renting whole office buildings for a song. See where I’m going with that?

See: Trostel v. American Life and Casualty


79 posted on 12/12/2010 3:24:15 AM PST by Freedom4US
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Pelham

Yes, those are them.

The problem arises because coins are required to have a nominal face value, when the metal price exceeds the face value it becomes profitable to sell the coins for scrap. This is why current law prevents scrapping nickles and cents, but not silver coinage - the latter having been demonetized and replaced with clad material.


80 posted on 12/12/2010 3:29:47 AM PST by Freedom4US
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson