Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/10/2010 9:23:21 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SeekAndFind

This is what Reagan did. He lowered tax rates and also reduced deductions (got rid of the two martini lunch deduction, for example.)

The mantra of the day was “revenue neutral.”

Why do I get the impression that Zero will reduce deductions, but not reduce tax rates?


2 posted on 12/10/2010 9:26:55 AM PST by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
Going to formalize wealth-redistribution to "equalize incomes" because there's "too much income disparity in the U.S. today".

We gottsta share the "pie".

3 posted on 12/10/2010 9:26:57 AM PST by traditional1 ("Don't gotsta worry 'bout no mo'gage, don't gotsta worry 'bout no gas; Obama gonna take care o' me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

It took two years to think about tax simplification? Obama style simplification: 1) What did you make? 2) Send it in!

Unless of course, you’re a favored class taker.


4 posted on 12/10/2010 9:27:41 AM PST by Pearls Before Swine (/s, in case you need to ask)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

“.... to lower rates and raise revenues.”

odd phraseology coming from the slimes.


5 posted on 12/10/2010 9:29:03 AM PST by sappy (criminalibs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
....and so the triangulation begins.

This could be a good start, if properly pursued, to end the IRS as we know it. Naturally, that's not what O has in mind, but from such little seeds..........

6 posted on 12/10/2010 9:29:06 AM PST by Pietro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
A consumer tax is the answer. First, the more you consume - the more you pay. Second, the drug dealers and pimps would finally have to pay like everyone else. Third, and most important, the welfare dependents would also have to pay. If they had to pay, they'd think twice about voting for new social programs and additional government jobs and pensions. THEY'D also be paying for it - or at least believe they are. They'd be voting themselves LESS money every time the democrats win instead!
If EVERYONE had to pay, higher taxes would become a campaign killer!
7 posted on 12/10/2010 9:32:10 AM PST by concerned about politics ("Get thee behind me, Liberal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

0bama + “Overhaul” = A VERY bad mix!


9 posted on 12/10/2010 9:33:27 AM PST by ScottinVA (The West needs to act NOW to aggressively treat its metastasizing islaminoma!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
There is only one tax reform measure worth doing and that is to throw the communist inspired income tax onto the ash heap of history, where it so properly belongs, and replace it with a broad based consumption tax such as the Fairtax bill currently pending in the House Ways and Means Committee!
12 posted on 12/10/2010 9:36:15 AM PST by Bigun ("It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere." Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Obama signaled his inclination in off-the-cuff remarks.Puts finger to wind.


13 posted on 12/10/2010 9:36:55 AM PST by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
Obama Weighs a Broad Tax Overhaul (simplifying income taxes for corporations and individuals)

Obama Weighs a Broad Tax Overhaul (simplifying increasing income taxes for corporations and individuals)

There - fixed it.

14 posted on 12/10/2010 9:37:33 AM PST by from occupied ga (Your most dangerous enemy is your own government,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Lies and more lies.

Remember when he said before the mid terms that he was going to lift the ban on offshore drilling.

Who is going to be fooled by his bull. No one.


15 posted on 12/10/2010 9:37:33 AM PST by Carley (ISRAEL.......NOT SO ALONE!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Barry wants a simple flat rate of 100%


17 posted on 12/10/2010 9:41:29 AM PST by WOBBLY BOB ( "I don't want the majority if we don't stand for something"- Jim Demint)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Any time a democrat wants to alter the tax system you can be certain that their real objectives are:

- To increase the amount the govenment extorts from taxpayers

- To increase wealth redistribution and stealth reparations

- To further their socialistic agenda

- To create more dependance on the government among the moocher class and protected classes


23 posted on 12/10/2010 9:43:20 AM PST by Iron Munro (This is our culture; fight for it. This is our flag; pick it up. This is our country; take it back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
Mr. Obama signaled his inclination in off-the-cuff remarks....

0' and Slimes coordinated effort to mold and shape the current discourse into one that furthers his/their agenda, away from the negative, for him, side of wikileaks and the debate around DADT, Dream, and tax "deals".

29 posted on 12/10/2010 10:04:55 AM PST by C210N (0bama, Making the US safe for Global Marxism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
get rid of the IRS and the hopelessly gerrymandered tax code as well as all the corruption and inefficiencies that go with it. Bring on the Fair Tax
30 posted on 12/10/2010 10:05:11 AM PST by paul51 (11 September 2001 - Never forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Footsies


32 posted on 12/10/2010 10:11:57 AM PST by FrankR (Don't let the bastards wear you down!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

There are millions of homeowners in the USA who qualified for their mortgages by including the deduction for the mortgage interest & the property taxes.

Making retroactive changes to those homeowners status could be a total disaster.

Making changes for NEW homeowners going forward could be an entirely different thing.


35 posted on 12/10/2010 10:24:08 AM PST by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
Resolved... That I will absolutely not participate in ANY discussion of proposals by Obama or any other "progressive" OF EITHER PARTY until problem one is addressed:

It's
The
Spending,
STUPID!!!!

43 posted on 12/10/2010 11:57:12 AM PST by Publius6961 ("In 1964 the War on Poverty Began --- Poverty won.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson