Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind

This is what Reagan did. He lowered tax rates and also reduced deductions (got rid of the two martini lunch deduction, for example.)

The mantra of the day was “revenue neutral.”

Why do I get the impression that Zero will reduce deductions, but not reduce tax rates?


2 posted on 12/10/2010 9:26:55 AM PST by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Yo-Yo

“President Obama is considering whether to push early next year for an overhaul of the income tax code to lower rates and raise revenues”

Now, when most Reaganites read that, they think great. When anyone with any idea of what this guy has in mind read it, they say great, my taxes, which I don’t pay anyway, will remain as is and anyone making more than 75K will pay twice what they are paying now.

This reminds me of something someone told me just before I left for a Johnny Mathis concert. He said, remember this, when he is singing his various love songs, the image he sees in his mind is not the one that you are seeing in yours.


34 posted on 12/10/2010 10:22:54 AM PST by Mouton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Yo-Yo

The reason he is talking to Bill Clinton is now obvious. It’s talk triangulating time.


42 posted on 12/10/2010 11:23:57 AM PST by AmericanVictory (Should we be more like them or they more like we used to be?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson