Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nader: I am looking for someone to challenge Obama in 2012
The Hill ^ | December 9, 2010 | Elise Viebeck

Posted on 12/09/2010 6:15:28 AM PST by Second Amendment First

Perennial third-party candidate Ralph Nader predicted on Wednesday that President Obama's tax deal with Republicans will earn him a primary challenge in 2012.

Though he wouldn't rule out another presidential campaign himself, Nader, 76, said he hoped that a new face would take up the progressive cause.

"I'm not foreclosing the possibility ... There are just other things to do," he said. "And it's time for someone else to continue. I've done it so many times. When I go around the country, I'm telling people they need to find somebody."

Nader, a consumer advocate, described the immense procedural difficulty — the "obstructions and litigations" — of appearing on the ballot in every state as a third-party candidate. He ran under the Green Party banner in 1996 and 2000 and as an independent in 2004 and 2008, and earned less than three percent of the overall vote each time.

He said on Wednesday that Obama's decision to allow tax-cut extensions for the wealthy in the lame-duck deal betrays the progressives who supported his campaign in 2008.

"There will be a primary," Nader said. "Just a question of how prominent a person [will run against Obama]. This deal is the last straw."

"Obama's position has been that the liberal, progressive wing has nowhere to go, therefore they can't turn their back on the administration. But a challenge will hold his feet to the fire and signal that we do have somewhere to go."

The tax deal, a blow to progressives, has prompted media speculation about such a challenge, although no names have been aired.

"He [Obama] keeps one step away from the liberal progressive grasp," Nader said, describing the mood among on the left. "He's always just one step ahead from them grabbing his neck."

He had harsh words for the president's approach to politics.

"He [Obama] has no fixed principles. He's opportunistic — he goes for expedience, like Clinton. Some call him temperamentally conflict-averse. If you want to be harsher, you say he has no prlnciples and he's opportunistic."

"He's a con man. I have no use for him," Nader said.

In the 2000 election, Nader was criticized for contributing to Al Gore's defeat by taking votes from the left. He said then and again on Wednesday that the progressive agenda must be on the national ballot every four years.

"These are majoritarian positions. The polling shows that. Living wage, single payer, cracking down on corporate crime ... It's time for someone to continue this."


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last
Go, Ralph, go!
1 posted on 12/09/2010 6:15:30 AM PST by Second Amendment First
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

Someone who isn’t 100 years old and nuttier than a fruitcake?


2 posted on 12/09/2010 6:17:29 AM PST by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First
He had harsh words for the president's approach to politics.

"He [Obama] has no fixed principles. He's opportunistic — he goes for expedience, like Clinton. Some call him temperamentally conflict-averse. If you want to be harsher, you say he has no prlnciples and he's opportunistic."

"He's a con man. I have no use for him," Nader said.

3 posted on 12/09/2010 6:17:45 AM PST by Second Amendment First
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

Hopefully, Nader will be the one.


4 posted on 12/09/2010 6:18:06 AM PST by IbJensen (The Marine Corps - When It Absolutely, Positively Has To Be Destroyed Overnight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

Nader is about as sharp as a bowling ball BUT he can mount a bodacious spoiler campaign..


5 posted on 12/09/2010 6:18:53 AM PST by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

Nader, to do that - you’ll need to find a lib with morals and a brain.

Good luck.


6 posted on 12/09/2010 6:19:20 AM PST by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe

Don’t know which would be better -
a third party socialist running against 0bama in the general,
or 0bama losing the primary and the ‘rats losing a huge voting block.


7 posted on 12/09/2010 6:20:18 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a (de)humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

So Naders a Racist?


8 posted on 12/09/2010 6:25:00 AM PST by PA-RIVER ( POTUS is a dishonest disrespectful POS who can't come clean with the Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

Every 4 years Ralphie needs money for a new suit.


9 posted on 12/09/2010 6:26:03 AM PST by Tijeras_Slim (Pablo lives jubtabulously!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First
Run, Ralph! You served your country well (if accidentally) in 2000 by preventing Gore's election. Do it again in 2012.
10 posted on 12/09/2010 6:27:29 AM PST by KarlInOhio (All monopolies are detestable, but the worst of all is the monopoly of education. -Frederic Bastiat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

Unsafe at any speed...that’s Ralph!

He could probably pull about 2 or 3 percent of the popular vote, perhaps more depending on how Mr. Obama conducts the rest of his term.

That could turn a state or two.

Stand on it, Ralph!


11 posted on 12/09/2010 6:29:51 AM PST by RexBeach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrB
[ or 0bama losing the primary and the ‘rats losing a huge voting block. ]

The blacks and moonbats will vote for whoever they are told to vote for..
SLAP.. SLAP... wake up.. pay attention...

12 posted on 12/09/2010 6:35:56 AM PST by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RexBeach

Nadar could pull 4-5% in some states where it could swing the election towards the GOP candidate.


13 posted on 12/09/2010 6:36:40 AM PST by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe

It the Democrats dump Obama in the primary, blacks will be very unenthusiastic in 2012.


14 posted on 12/09/2010 6:37:59 AM PST by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe

if the ‘rats lose 20 percent of their black voting block even to apathy (staying home), they cannot win.


15 posted on 12/09/2010 6:40:15 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a (de)humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First
Nader said, describing the mood among on the left. "He's always just one step ahead from them grabbing his neck."

Well it didn't take the White Democrat Masters all that long to reveal their true intentions toward any uppity Black man who dares to step out of line.

Let's not forget the KKK was the enforcement division on the DemonRat Party.


16 posted on 12/09/2010 6:40:15 AM PST by Upstate NY Guy (Gen 15:16 The iniquity of the Amorite is not yet complete.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe; MrB
Depending on which analyst you go with, approximately 4 - 6 million African-American voters who never voted before in their lives voted for Obama.

If he is unseated in a primary, you can pretty much count on several million of those new-minted 2008 voters to stay home.

So you're both right: African-American voters will indeed vote 90+% for the Democrat in any given race, but the number of those voters who show up for the general will be noticeably lower in the wake of any success by a primary challenger.

17 posted on 12/09/2010 6:50:53 AM PST by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

I believe Representative Dennis Kucinich has everything you’re looking for, Mr. Nader.

Name recognition — communist idealogue — good fundraiser — nuttier than a fruitcake.

Perfect.

A strong Green candidate in 2012 — would that be sweet, or what.


18 posted on 12/09/2010 6:51:57 AM PST by Nervous Tick (Trust in God, but row away from the rocks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

Folks like Nader don’t believe in compromise. They’re totalitarians. It’s their way or the highway.


19 posted on 12/09/2010 7:12:46 AM PST by popdonnelly (Class warfare is Obama's thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Upstate NY Guy
the enforcement division on of the DemonRat Party.

Spell correction, duhhh...

20 posted on 12/09/2010 7:15:57 AM PST by Upstate NY Guy (Gen 15:16 The iniquity of the Amorite is not yet complete.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson