Posted on 12/08/2010 12:48:11 PM PST by ButThreeLeftsDo
House Republicans on Wednesday thwarted a Democratic effort to award $250 checks to Social Security recipients facing a second consecutive year without a cost-of-living increase.
President Barack Obama and Democrats have urged approval of the one-time payment, saying seniors barely getting by on their Social Security checks face undue hardships without the COLA increase.
But Republicans contended that the nation couldn't afford the estimated $14 billion cost of the payment, and that the COLA freezes in 2010 and 2011 come after seniors received a significant boost in 2009.
(Excerpt) Read more at startribune.com ...
Last years “$250.00” check turned out to be an advance on any over payment of withholding taxes that I had to deduct on what I got back at the end of the year. So much for last year’s “gift” and I bet this year’s will be the same.
While fudging the CPI is undoubtedly going, my post addressed only the totally separate issue that there was no vote held to freeze the COLA.
there was NO $250.00 last year...It was in 2009 that they so generously gave each senior $250.00
The Government is the problem and we need to start now cleaning the House and Senate for 2012.
‘food, gas, home heating, electric bills’
These items are specifically excluded from the calculation of ‘underlying inflation’.
I remember when George Bush wanted to give taxpayers a $400 rebate, Tom Daschle sneered that it wasn’t enough t buy a car muffler. Now The MSM is trumpeting this chump change as being manna from heaven.
Because a rise in Soc. Sec. disbursement is specifically tied to inflation. It’s the law. No inflation, no bonus.
If you are not satisfied with it then change the law. ;)
Incidentally, Congress gets a raise every year - automatically. It’s written into the procedure.
They would actually have to have a vote to stop the raise.... something they should do immediately. Not to mention the pay cuts they should take.
But yet they find all this money to bailout foreign banks and GE., and pay themselves their COLA.
And yet if you compare the SS payment today to the SS payment of, say, 1990, and then compare the income of today with the income of 1990, do you find a disparity? If not, how can you say the CPI isn’t a rational measurement, whether you think it’s cooked or not?
I know that some people argue the real cost of living for old people is different because they buy different things, or because they use MORE of things because they are older and therefore their costs go up, or have other complaints about the CPI as applied to seniors.
But those are all things that, if we wanted to, we would need to fix by legislation. Right now, SS is adjusted by the standard CPI, and doesn’t care if old people have a different “basket” of goods they buy.
I wasn't jumping on you. Just pointing out another instance of government chicanery, which happens, I must point out, to be a related issue. When the bureaucrats cut common expenses from the CPI in order to hide the rise in "Cost of Living", the effect is the same.
Damn..... I already spent our promised $500 on silver
....SO WHY CANT I HAVE MY COLA???....
It is m understanding that the cola is based on a rise in the consumer price index value. There was no rise in the CPI.
There was a rise in some components but not the total index value.
This looks so bad.....they should of passed this. Now, the Dems/media are saying Rebubs refuse a measly $250 to seniors but let the ‘rich’ keep millions in tax breaks. I am already reading that which prompted me to find this thread....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.