Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GraceG

How was it an example of the tragedy of the commons?
I guess, if the trees were owned by everyone and thus by no one, no one could really protest against their harvest.

However, if I were reading this to my kids, I’d point out that a good businessman would make sure to plant more trees as he harvested the existing trees in order to ensure the continuation of his business.


13 posted on 12/06/2010 10:02:32 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a (de)humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: MrB

[ How was it an example of the tragedy of the commons?
I guess, if the trees were owned by everyone and thus by no one, no one could really protest against their harvest.

However, if I were reading this to my kids, I’d point out that a good businessman would make sure to plant more trees as he harvested the existing trees in order to ensure the continuation of his business. ]

No one owned the trees, they could go in a clear cut the trees and no one cared because they thought they could last forever. If the Company owned the part of Lorax tree forest they would have realized after clear cutting their own section they would have no more and they would have been planting at the same rate of cutting them down, they would also manage the lorax, leaving the young trees to grow bigger and cutting down the trees which were nearing their natural decline. Eventually they would have expanded their lorax forest and everyone would be happy.


18 posted on 12/06/2010 10:18:45 AM PST by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson