[Sprite518]

I knew it. The government lied again... Imagine that???

The video in the article says it all.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4WGcSuGojYA&feature=player_embedded

[Sprite518]

Here you click on this leak. I hope this goes viral!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4WGcSuGojYA&feature=player_embedded

[alicewonders]

Bookmarking for later, thanks.

[Fundamentally Fair]

The article is nothing but an ad for extended World Nut Daily coverage...$99 per year, or $9.95 per month...geez.

[Ditter]

After reading articles yesterday I was convinced it was a plane, now I have been flipped back the other way. What to believe, what to believe????????

[fso301]

Folks! The sea off the Southern California coast is full of ships; inbound and outbound. Many if not most of the ships have security cameras running 24/7. While ships would have been all around the approximate launch site, there was not one single whisper from one single vessel about having sighted anything resembling a missile launch.

[ltc8k6]

Again, the warning is about small surface missiles used in ship to ship warfare and it also does not appear to be for the date in question.

The report is dated Nov 6, but the warning is for October.

The report is a list of prior warnings.

[reegs]

I posted this a few weeks ago. A strange contrail appeared over the Cleveland skyline. Something about it tells me it was definitley a missile.

[=8 mrrabbit 8=]

I’ve lost count of the number of times that BOTH Worldnet Daily AND Canada Free Press have posted BREAKING NEWS or ORIGNAL NEWS weeks after others and myself have already posted the source material for explaining or detailing the where’s, how’s, why’s, etc., here at Free Republic.

=8-(

[Charles Martel]

Heck, who knows? With all the back-and-forth contradictory statements on this, it may just as easily have been:

[The Comedian]

There's a missile base right there. Warnings are issued all the time.

Frowning takes 68 muscles.
Smiling takes 6.
Pulling this trigger takes 2.
I'm lazy.

[Mr. Jeeves]

It probably was a jet contrail.

But since the government says it was a jet contrail, there is now reason for skepticism. :)

[D-fendr]

Sheesh, what groping by WND.

And the refusal to provide answers to specific questions suggests a cover-up of potential secret missile testing in the area – contrary to official jet contrail explanation.

Yeah sure. No real beef in the article. Author complains of DOD response, but

"At the Pentagon, Lt. Col. Robert Ditchey from the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Public Affairs reaffirmed DOD's original statement by saying that inquiries were made with each of the services and the Department of Homeland Security which includes the Federal Aviation Administration and it was concluded that there were no launches that day.

"All DOD entities with rocket and missile programs reported no launches, scheduled or inadvertent, during the time period in the area of the reported contrail," Ditchey said.

"In addition, the FAA ran radar replays from Monday afternoon (of Nov. 8) of a large area west of Los Angeles," he added. "Those replays did not reveal anything unusual. The FAA also did not receive reports of any unusual sightings from pilots who were flying in the area Monday afternoon."

And they reprint the misleading comment form the article they posted before:

"The question that still must be answered is why NORAD's muted response was simply that North America was not threatened…"

False. NORAD's response was:

“We can confirm that there is no threat to our nation, and from all indications this was not a launch by a foreign military."

DOD says no US rocket launches, NORAD says no foreign launches.

WND uses sleazy methods to try to hype it's previous story. Works unless you read it.

[Arrowhead1952]

Have you seen this?