U.S. warned people to avoid mystery missile zone

World Net Daily ^ | 12/01/2010 | F. Michael Maloof

[Sprite518]

The Department of Defense is slamming the door on questions about the mysterious contrail filmed Nov. 8 by a KCBS television crew near Los Angeles after questions were raised about a warning from the National Geo-Spatial Intelligence Agency that there could be missiles fired in that area at that time.

[Sto Zvirat]

Come on missile boy, show us some data, some proof.

You all haven’t had a shred of evidence for 5 weeks now.

Show me the data.

[Sprite518]

Hey dumba$$ I don’t care what you think? If you want to let the government and the media lead you around by the nose then go right ahead schmuck!

Did you know this? My guess is probably not, and even if you did.... Then I can hear you say, “Duh DUH DUH duh... what does this have to do with anything?”. Funny how you cannot put two and two together. Yeah there is no correlation with Chinese Subs popping up out of the blue in places we leaset expect it.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-492804/The-uninvited-guest-Chinese-sub-pops-middle-U-S-Navy-exercise-leaving-military-chiefs-red-faced.html

If you want to be a dumb Schmuck and believe the government line, the you go right ahead.Oh but the government and the media did not tell you right??? So that means it never happened. LOL! Priceless...

[SeeSac]

If you want to be a dumb Schmuck and believe the government line, the you go right ahead.

Interesting. To support your case that the government always lies, you point to a story originating from a government source. Very interesting.

[SeeSac]

“Hey dumba$$ I don’t care what you think? If you want to let the government and the media lead you around by the nose then go right ahead schmuck!

Did you know this? .... “

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-492804/The-uninvited-guest-Chinese-sub-pops-middle-U-S-Navy-exercise-leaving-military-chiefs-red-faced.html

---

Let me get this straight. You claim the guy is a dumba$$ for believeing the governement and the media and then to prove your case you link and article published in the media and sourced to the government?

[SeeSac]

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-492804/The-uninvited-guest-Chinese-sub-pops-middle-U-S-Navy-exercise-leaving-military-chiefs-red-faced.html

“If you want to be a dumb Schmuck and believe the government line, the you go right ahead.Oh but the government and the media did not tell you right??? So that means it never happened. LOL! Priceless...”

---

Are you saying that the article about the sub is a lie because it is the government line published in the media?

[beezdotcom]

Let me get this straight. You claim the guy is a dumba$$ for believeing the governement and the media and then to prove your case you link and article published in the media and sourced to the government?

Well, let me weigh in on THAT concept (while still professing my belief that it was an airplane contrail).

It depends on the type of lying you think the government does. This article might be useful in one of two categories:

1) If this is what the lying government will actually admit, imagine the stuff they WON'T admit.

2) You might consider it a deliberate catch-all "plant" article. i.e, a completely fabricated article that is designed to be released, as a contingency scenario for future issues that may arise - "hey, look, when we say it's an airplane it must be, we would have told you otherwise - look, we told you about that sub that popped up before." It works for multiple things: "Hey, if there was really voter fraud, we would have prosecuted - look, we told you about that one case where we did."

All of that to say: contrail.

[SeeSac]

1) If this is what the lying government will actually admit, imagine the stuff they WON'T admit. If that is the case, then the government doesn't lie, they just don't reveal. Thus their statements are true related to all the evidence produced by government agencies on the contrail

2) You might consider it a deliberate catch-all "plant" article. i.e, a completely fabricated article that is designed to be released, as a contingency scenario for future issues that may arise - "hey, look, when we say it's an airplane it must be, we would have told you otherwise - look, we told you about that sub that popped up before." It works for multiple things: "Hey, if there was really voter fraud, we would have prosecuted - look, we told you about that one case where we did." In that case the dudes reference that the sub event happened as support that the contrail was a missile fails.

All of that to say: contrail. All of that to say: contrail.

[Sprite518]

Let me clarify it for you. Did you notice it was a foreign source???

At any rate, I believe the media, in the USA, for the most part is basically a tool of the government. Which would explain why its so pro government and pro Obama. For instance, if you ever listen to Rush when he runs the tape of multiple different news media sources all using the EXACT SAME WORDS verbatim. In other words for the most part they are not a watch dog but a lap dog to our government.

[Sprite518]

The entire post went flying over your head. LOL! See post #328

Here is a new word for you. Government Media Complex...

I hope that does not go over your head too.

[Sprite518]

See post 328...

[Sprite518]

Just in case you missed these two links..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4WGcSuGojYA&feature=player_embedded

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-492804/The-uninvited-guest-Chinese-sub-pops-middle-U-S-Navy-exercise-leaving-military-chiefs-red-faced.html

Airplane my a$$...

[SeeSac]

Let me clarify it for you. Did you notice it was a foreign source???

Oh. You didn't clarify in your previous post that only the US media lies. BTW, what was the DPs source for their story?

[Sprite518]

The FAA said there was no plane flying in the area.

[Sprite518]

Check with them... Oh so you think they just made it up out of the blue 3 years ago??? LOL! Very weak...

[SeeSac]

The FAA said there was no plane flying in the area.

That is NOT what the FAA said.

[SeeSac]

Check with them... Oh so you think they just made it up out of the blue 3 years ago??? LOL! Very weak...

You evaded the question. Please cite where the DM got their story. Or is it too embarrassing for you to answer.

[Sprite518]

LOL!!! You very weak to no strength at all in your argument. That is so pathetic? Did I write the article??? No schmuck! Check with the person who wrote the article. How old are you??? LOL!

[Sprite518]

Here is a source for you that says the FAA said that.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4WGcSuGojYA&feature=player_embedded

Now show me your link from the FAA that says it was an airplane. Oh and which airplane makes a trail that looks like a missile.

[SeeSac]

Here is a source for you that says the FAA said that.

Does not support your statement. Thank you.

[SeeSac]

LOL!!! You very weak to no strength at all in your argument. That is so pathetic? Did I write the article??? No schmuck! Check with the person who wrote the article. How old are you??? LOL!

ooh. Seems their source is the evil government that always lies!