To: mandaladon
Van Jones says we are going to be more ethnically diverse but less economically prosperous. Does he have enough brain cell to connect the two? I doubt it. We are less economically prosperous because we are more ethnically diverse. I've seen saying that for 20 years to anyone who would listen. All ethnically diverse nations tear themselves to pieces unless their is an assimilation process. We abandoned this in 1965 with the Immigration and Reform Act. Thanks Democrats.
30 posted on
12/05/2010 4:31:59 PM PST by
truthguy
(Good intentions are not enough.)
To: truthguy
"We are less economically prosperous because we are more ethnically diverse." Absolutely true!
By definition there are no such things as "diverse" nations.
45 posted on
12/05/2010 4:52:01 PM PST by
StormEye
To: truthguy
The existence of mythelation and auto-somal recessives guarantees that there’ll always be plenty of diversity around ~ it’s not just a black and white world.
75 posted on
12/05/2010 6:14:33 PM PST by
muawiyah
(GIT OUT THE WAY ~ REPUBLICANS COMIN' THROUGH)
To: truthguy
Van Jones says we are going to be more ethnically diverse but less economically prosperous...Sounds like India.
Balkanization of the northen american hemisphere will not realize the dreams of the left - it will retire their dreams permanently.
141 posted on
12/06/2010 2:37:26 AM PST by
x_plus_one
(Who sews the wind reaps the storm...)
To: truthguy
Exactly.
The only chance we had was assimilation into the general American identity, in which ethnic identity is sublimated to a common identity. That has been destroyed, and balkanization will result.
145 posted on
12/06/2010 6:01:12 AM PST by
ecomcon
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson