Gondring makes us laugh by saying that we should support a “conservative” who does not realize that the “separation of church and state” is NOT in the US Constitution.
This is one more example of Gondring lying. We went through this over and over and over.
Christine is correct. Her critics are clueless.
Gondring, WHY didn’t anyone collect the $1,000 reward?
http://www.supportchristine.com/rewardpressrelease.html
Christine O’Donnell was correct on the Constitution.
But what “conservative” does Gondring think would AGREE with things *NOT* in the US Constitution are in the US Constitution? If that is what Gondring thinks as a “conservative” we area all having a good laugh.
Point out where I said what you claimed.
You can't, because you made it up and hope that readers don't catch it.
Now, let's look at an actual response from Christine O'Donnell.
Chris Coons> "'Government shall make no establishment of religion.'"
Christine O'Donnell> "That's in the First Amendment?"
I suppose next you'll tell me that Mike Castle snuck in and stole her copy of the Constitution so she couldn't look up what the 14th and 16th Amendments are (also in the debate).
This is one more example of Gondring lying. We went through this over and over and over.
B.S.
If we had, then the evidence wouldn't be sitting so plainly there to support my position, where everyone can go look themselves.
Christine is correct. Her critics are clueless.
Correct in what...questioning whether "'Government shall make no establishment of religion.'" is in the First Amendment? Well, those literal words aren't, but it does say, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion [...]"
Are you claiming that Christine O'Donnell's big GOTCHA! is a couple of missing words that are of minor relevance to the question asked?
Gondring, WHY didnt anyone collect the $1,000 reward?
Because it's one of your straw men.
Reader--take note how he tries to cover her goof by pretending people were criticizing her for something else. You can't find the phrase "pickled vase tendrils" in the Bill of Rights, but even if I offered a reward, that action would be meannigless.
Christine ODonnell was correct on the Constitution.
She admitted she didn't know it. So I guess she was right on that.
But what conservative does Gondring think would AGREE with things *NOT* in the US Constitution are in the US Constitution?
Correct your syntax so the sentence is grammatical and maybe I could answer it.
If that is what Gondring thinks as a conservative we area all having a good laugh.
Laugh about it; shout about it! I'm glad things are looking up for you. Are you still skipping meds, though? Better check in with the doc.