Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Graham: GOP 'made some pretty poor choices' for Senate candidates this fall
The Hill ^ | 12/04/10 11:46 AM ET | By Michael O'Brien

Posted on 12/04/2010 4:05:23 PM PST by onyx

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) said that Republicans "made some pretty poor choices" in choosing their Senate candidates this fall.

Graham, in a Senate floor speech on Saturday, made an aside comment underscoring the frustration the GOP faced after some Tea Party-aligned nominees fell short in their campaigns.

"The House had a dramatic election. We picked up seats in the Senate," Graham said, video of which is posted by C-SPAN. "Some of us thought, maybe we could pick up two or three more, but we made some pretty poor choices when it came to candidates."

The South Carolina Republican made the comment as an aside to remarks about the consequences facing lawmakers who vote to allow an increase in taxes. Senate Democrats fell short of the necessary votes in a rare Saturday vote that would have allowed taxes go up on top earners.

Still, Republicans bargaining position in those votes and in legislative fights next year might have been strengthened had the party's nominees performed better in Senate races.

Many of the Tea Party favorites who won GOP primaries went onto disappointing finishes in the general election, some in races where Republicans needed to win if they were to have any hope of reclaiming a Senate majority. Those losing candidates included Christine O'Donnell in Delaware, Ken Buck in Colorado, and particularly Sharron Angle in Nevada, where Republicans had hoped to knock off Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.).

Graham is seen as a possible incumbent who might face a primary from a Tea Party type when he's up for reelection in South Carolina in 2014.



TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: South Carolina
KEYWORDS: frontpage; lindseygraham; mclameslapdog; rino
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last
To: onyx

Yeah, people like Murkowski and McCain were pretty poor choices.


41 posted on 12/04/2010 5:02:16 PM PST by Ingtar (If Washington and his peers had been RINOs, we would still be a British colony.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ingtar

graham, one of the ultimate “poor choices”, discusses “poor choices”. Pot meet Kettle.


42 posted on 12/04/2010 5:05:41 PM PST by hal ogen (1st Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: elpadre
Republican hierarchy made major mistakes by not fully supporting every Republican nominee, and they should be constantly reminded of their failure!!

Precisely!

43 posted on 12/04/2010 5:07:59 PM PST by onyx (If you truly support Sarah Palin and want on her busy ping list, let me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: onyx
Hell South Carolina has made a damn poor choice twice.
44 posted on 12/04/2010 5:10:03 PM PST by org.whodat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vision

It’s amazing how insulated these people are.
Term limits now.________________________________

Linsay even SOUNDS insulated. What—they’ve just been there so long there is no concept of an election or even a challenge? Graham has GOT TO BE BEATEN. He is no good to us changing colors every day, throwing us a bone on Monday and ambushing us T-F.


45 posted on 12/04/2010 5:14:46 PM PST by RitaOK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: onyx
I am amazed that Graham has never been caught in a bathhouse.
46 posted on 12/04/2010 5:16:25 PM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onyx

What an incredible DORK this “man” is...

Arrogant POS.


47 posted on 12/04/2010 5:33:35 PM PST by NFHale (The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
I always check HillBuzz when I want to know if a politician is a homosexual, because I figure "they know" and they've had Lindsey Graham on their gaydar seemingly forever.
48 posted on 12/04/2010 5:43:33 PM PST by onyx (If you truly support Sarah Palin and want on her busy ping list, let me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: NFHale

Yes, damn arrogant for a “man” with so much to hide.


49 posted on 12/04/2010 5:45:20 PM PST by onyx (If you truly support Sarah Palin and want on her busy ping list, let me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: onyx

Calling him a man is being charitable.


50 posted on 12/04/2010 5:46:37 PM PST by NFHale (The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: onyx

Why doesnt pro choice graham just switch parties already


51 posted on 12/04/2010 5:48:01 PM PST by italianquaker ( teabag the vote!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onyx

What a jackass.


52 posted on 12/04/2010 5:48:49 PM PST by SC_Pete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TribalPrincess2U
I will be working diligently yet again for his retirement.
53 posted on 12/04/2010 5:51:49 PM PST by John 3_19-21 (The Tea Party will be heard Mr. Speaker!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: italianquaker
He's pro-life.
54 posted on 12/04/2010 5:56:46 PM PST by onyx (If you truly support Sarah Palin and want on her busy ping list, let me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: TribalPrincess2U

The nerve of this Guy to say such a thing!

I would prefer O’Donnell as Senator over this guy.

WE NEED TO SEND MONEY TO PRIMARY OUT THIS ARROGANT SIN-ATOR GRAHAMNESTY!


55 posted on 12/04/2010 6:05:57 PM PST by convertedtoreason ( Nature tells us to take a LIBERTARIAN CONSERVATIVE stance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA

YUCKADOODLE!


56 posted on 12/04/2010 6:07:01 PM PST by convertedtoreason ( Nature tells us to take a LIBERTARIAN CONSERVATIVE stance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: onyx

From Wikipedia: “Graham has never been married and when asked by Robert Draper of the NYTimes said he wasn’t gay.”


57 posted on 12/04/2010 6:12:24 PM PST by Atlantan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: onyx

I can’t stand Graham BUT he is right we chose crappy candidates in Nevada colarado And delaware. Let’s be honest. I still hope he loses when up for re-election but we should have had 3 more seats


58 posted on 12/04/2010 6:13:03 PM PST by GoMonster (GO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Atlantan

I don’t have any personal or confirmed knowledge of his sexuality and for that matter I really don’t much care, unless he *is* a black-mailed, closeted homosexual.

For all I know, he’s just a bachelor, uninterested in men or women.


59 posted on 12/04/2010 6:24:39 PM PST by onyx (If you truly support Sarah Palin and want on her busy ping list, let me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: onyx

Sissy Boy is going down in 2014, methinks.


60 posted on 12/04/2010 6:24:39 PM PST by Nonstatist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson