To: umgud
This is nothing but an attempt to move consumers to On Star which is a Government Motors product. Cell phones are direct competition to this product and they don’t like it. Not too long ago there was a commercial running were a guy gets into a accident and can’t find his cell phone because of the impact. The hook was that On Star was there and came to the rescue.
To: RBW in PA
>This is nothing but an attempt to move consumers to On Star which is a Government Motors product.
Most intriguing.
16 posted on
12/03/2010 3:44:54 PM PST by
OneWingedShark
(Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
To: RBW in PA
Only problem is that OnStar(tm) uses the same frequencies that cell phones do. GPS uses 1.5Ghz, so depending on the splash of the jammer, GPS may not be affected. OnStar(tm) would. Jammers may also affect B/G 802.11 wireless internet.
/johnny
To: RBW in PA
This is nothing but an attempt to move consumers to On Star which is a Government Motors product. Cell phones are direct competition to this product and they don’t like it. Not too long ago there was a commercial running were a guy gets into a accident and can’t find his cell phone because of the impact. The hook was that On Star was there and came to the rescue. Well that explains a lot for me.
28 posted on
12/03/2010 3:55:05 PM PST by
ColdOne
(GOP just say NO. Well that was the plan, what happened? No common ground, EVER!)
To: RBW in PA
The more I think of the technical ways this might be accomplished, the more psychotic this LaHood organism becomes.
56 posted on
12/03/2010 5:01:30 PM PST by
Erasmus
(Personal goal: Have a bigger carbon footprint than Tony Robbins.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson