Paragraphs exist for a reason. That's why those sentences were in separate paragraphs.
To O'Donnell supporters, any criticism of her was immediately labeled an "attack" irrespective of how deeply rooted in truth and logic that criticism may have been. Put another way, any critical comment was an attack. That's wholly unhealthy to any political movement, the conservative movement included.
The reference to "blood sport" was with respect to the scrutiny ANY candidate faces in a general statewide race. It's brutal. And, to people who were more than just casual political observers - like Rove - it was plainly self-evident that O'Donnell was going to disintegrate in a general election. He was right.
"Now, there is plenty of room for disagreement there, "
If that's true, we can't be afraid to criticize conservative celebrities, even though those celebrities say the right things. Saying the right thing is only part of the political equation that leads to victory.
I can accept that. ;0) As long as the personal hostility is toned down I see great value in everybody's viewpoint (well, most everybody anyway.) Thanks for your input.