Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: OldDeckHand

Perhaps this blurb is totally untrue.


32 posted on 12/03/2010 1:05:11 PM PST by eleni121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: eleni121
"Perhaps this blurb is totally untrue."

Or, perhaps not.

Foster published an comment later in the story I posted. It says in part...

"...Paul voted against censure before he voted for it. He voted for a net tax hike, period. And I'll leave it to readers to decide if Paul was merely stating the technicality that Assange can't be prosecuted for treason because he's Australian...."

If you want to explore what Paul said about Wikileaks, you might want to start with this story...

December 3, 2010 Texas Rep. Ron Paul: Don’t prosecute WikiLeaks’ Julian Assange

Maybe it's me, but that seems like a full-throated defense of Assange.

37 posted on 12/03/2010 1:10:56 PM PST by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson