Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: roses of sharon

I would like to weigh in on some of this DADT discussion

The U.S. Military had better get ready for implementation of the U.S. Department of State’s Foreign Service Manuals, Foreign Service Regulations, and other official policy bulletins and memorandums being utilized as the “benchmark” from which they are rewritten into the DOD Regulations supporting Gays, Lesbians, Bi and Transgendered employees. Some background for you to investigate.

Obama signed a Presidential declaration starting in 2009 that the month of June is LGBT/Appreciation of Gays, with the same type awareness as Asian Pacific Islanders/Black History/Hispanic Months are recognized by the military.
The US Department of State, under Hillary Clinton’s directives have promoted this “Diversity” by making gay partners eligible to become actual “members of household (MOH)” eligible for Family Member Employment via Human Recourses; the Department of State has rewrote the Foreign Affairs Manuals, along with the Foreign Affairs Regulations, to support this implementation. Under the Secretary of State’s guidance, a man can have a gay lover and even that lover’s children put on their official orders and this is permitted to be supported by the Department of State as “Dependents”, yet someone living a non-gay lifestyle cannot have a live in girlfriend as a Member of Household.
All of this information should be available publically from the Department of State’s Public Affairs Office upon request. Be sure to ask for the Presidential Proclamation, Secretary Hillary’s annual correspondence and Cable Traffic, and Department Notices. Also request the FAMs and FARs allowing gay MOH to be supported by the Department of State either financially or with other privileges normally extended to Family Members.
An angle which I believe should be explored is whether there is an actual financial earmark or line item expenditure authorized for the Secretary of State’s actions, or is this an unfunded expenditure mandated by Hillary and endorsed by the President himself? Are these Social Engineering efforts legal when appropriated funding is being budgeted to give travel allowances, dependent COLA and other pay to support non-spouse “Members of Household” at the Department of State?


41 posted on 12/03/2010 11:14:34 AM PST by Jumper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Jumper
An angle which I believe should be explored is whether there is an actual financial earmark or line item expenditure authorized for the Secretary of State’s actions, or is this an unfunded expenditure mandated by Hillary and endorsed by the President himself? Are these Social Engineering efforts legal when appropriated funding is being budgeted to give travel allowances, dependent COLA and other pay to support non-spouse “Members of Household” at the Department of State?

I agree -it is time the government imposed homosexual robin hood get called upon the carpet by those whose purse he steals from...

To take from the morally upright and give to the morally corrupted is not my idea of justice served...

118 posted on 12/03/2010 10:29:43 PM PST by DBeers (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson