Posted on 12/02/2010 2:02:35 PM PST by bigbob
Inscrutable, ain't they?...
Ancient Chinese secret.
‘-)
Just imagine how very, very nice it would be if posters would actually use the spell-check that FR has already provided.
> “At least one plane was in the area at that time”
.
Not according to the ARTC.
I twisted his sentences to show the irony of his comment "Conjecture is pointless and only leads to batshyt crazy theorizing." then followed with his lead statement Someone launched a missile.
That was the context of that post. I have always maintained that it was not a missile.
SO, someone must be under orders.
The extra f is for you.
> “If the trail was a missile, it was headed for the US mainland”
.
Absolutely not!
It was headed out to sea in a northwesterly direction.
Maybe you’re from the east coast, and think it was sunrise rather than sunset?
The shadow patterns show that it was headed out.
Contrails are not politics. Which is why I can post on a thread like this.
> “Respectfully, if you have a more recent statement from Mr. Richardson, please share it with all of us, and help us understand why he changed his opinion”
.
He didn’t.
Tolsti2 is a liar that is just spewing excrement out of his piehole.
.
That is, it would be funny if it wasn't about such a serious thing.
Unbelievable. The lighting in the video in HIS post #38 is A CONTRAIL OBVIOUSLY because the UNDERSIDE of the contrail is lit by the setting sun. IT IS HORIZONTAL. The Leyvas video, taken at sunset, shows a side-lit plume; it is sidelit because it was horizontal. It was headed north-west.
Anybody who believes him when he says "I was there -- I saw it," is a sucker supreme.
Kind of like the FReeper contrail pusher who kept saying, "I LIVE here!" as if she lived in the L.A. area and knew the nightly skies well ... but who actually lives in San Diego. Sort of like the FReeper contrail pushers who stated as fact again and again, that cameraman Gil Leyvas "said it was headed EAST!" ... until a FReeper of integrity posted a link to the actual interview where Leyvas clearly states that it appeared to be headed "in a westerly direction."
This whole affair has been incredibly instructive the mechanisms of pointed, aggressive disinformation techniques.
er .. sidlit because it was VERTICAL. *goof*
> “BTW, the California phenomenon had to do with airplanes and contrails and clouds, and the position of the Sun in the sky (just over the horizon). There was no missile”
.
Absolutely wrong!
There were no airliners during the time period. ARTC publicly stated this at least twice. Their radar would not of had any liklihood of catching the missile due to the fact that missiles rise vertically and rapidly, while an airliner would have been caught by at least 15 passes of the radar.
.
I sent an email to a Jane’s on Nov. 16 but haven’t received a reply.
The only other mention I’ve found made by Jane’s is the following article....
http://www.janes.com/news/defence/systems/jmr/jmr101119_1_n.shtml
....of which only about a third is available to non-subscribers
> “The PLAN (Chinese Navy) does- but it makes zero sense for them to do so. If your potential opponent has an exploitable weakness like a relatively undefended coastline- it is glaring stupidity to point it out to him with a big, un-ignorable, dramatic display which will force them to take action to remedy it.”
.
But they’ve allready done exactly that several times when their subs have popped up in the middle of carrier groups in the Pacific, unnoticed until they surface.
It is a well known problem.
> “Smells like a guy with an agenda, to me.”
.
Without question.
This place draws lots of paid operators with agendas.
> “Now Janes.”
.
Not true.
> “This whole affair has been incredibly instructive the mechanisms of pointed, aggressive disinformation techniques.”
.
Exactly.
Especially considering the perps that are doing the posting of the contrail madness.
It's a plane.
If you will but read through every single FreeRepublic thread on the matter you will eventually see the light.
BTW, if it were a missile it'd have been at least ONE MILE WIDE. This is a fact readily ascertained from content in the video.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.