That is, it would be funny if it wasn't about such a serious thing.
Unbelievable. The lighting in the video in HIS post #38 is A CONTRAIL OBVIOUSLY because the UNDERSIDE of the contrail is lit by the setting sun. IT IS HORIZONTAL. The Leyvas video, taken at sunset, shows a side-lit plume; it is sidelit because it was horizontal. It was headed north-west.
Anybody who believes him when he says "I was there -- I saw it," is a sucker supreme.
Kind of like the FReeper contrail pusher who kept saying, "I LIVE here!" as if she lived in the L.A. area and knew the nightly skies well ... but who actually lives in San Diego. Sort of like the FReeper contrail pushers who stated as fact again and again, that cameraman Gil Leyvas "said it was headed EAST!" ... until a FReeper of integrity posted a link to the actual interview where Leyvas clearly states that it appeared to be headed "in a westerly direction."
This whole affair has been incredibly instructive the mechanisms of pointed, aggressive disinformation techniques.
er .. sidlit because it was VERTICAL. *goof*
> “This whole affair has been incredibly instructive the mechanisms of pointed, aggressive disinformation techniques.”
.
Exactly.
Especially considering the perps that are doing the posting of the contrail madness.
He says everything anybody could want.
You must take the time to watch the two and listen to what he really said. If you watch only one you'll never know what he said.