[econjack]

Contrail my butt. Anyone who's seen the video can't possibly chalk it off to a conventional contrail of a commercial aircraft. I don't want to jump on the Chinese missile bandwagon, but whatever it was, it sure as hell wasn't a plane's contrail.

[70th Division]

that is exactly what an expert in the field said. He was X military and has seen hundreds of missiles fired. This is another cover up like flight 800

[spookie]

I worked at Vandenberg for seven years in he late 70s to 80s and routinely watched similar launches by Minutemen and special missiles. No plane can fly at such a steep angle for so long. When they closed Adak, that enable subs to travel down our coast without being detected. That is the benefit Democratic presidents give us.

[Yo-Yo]

I don't want to jump on the Chinese missile bandwagon, but whatever it was, it sure as hell wasn't a plane's contrail.

Yeah, it was. Aircraft heading combined with wind shear gave the contrail its unusual appearance, but it was not unprecedented.

contrailscience.com

I know that I'm never going to change the minds of conspiracy theorists, but I at least have to try.

[RFEngineer]

“Anyone who’s seen the video can’t possibly chalk it off to a conventional contrail of a commercial aircraft.”

I can. The experts quoted in this article are wrong. I love it when “experts” are wrong. They won’t admit it, because there is an “expert commentator” conspiracy that doesn’t allow them to admit they stepped on their cranks by claiming “certainty” of a contrail.

I don’t know why all these shills for “expert commentators” are jumping on these threads - I think that they are simply getting paid to cover up the truth.