This is Jennifer Rubin's first column for WaPo. She used to be at Commentary until yesterday. I don't think MA's version of Obamacare is Romney's main problem. Didn't MA have a veto proof majority in each house?
1 posted on
12/01/2010 7:49:02 PM PST by
neverdem
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
To: neverdem
Pence, DeMint, Bolton, Bachmann, Hunter. Let’s get some conservative blood into this race.
2 posted on
12/01/2010 7:51:37 PM PST by
pissant
(THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
To: neverdem
Yes, it is Mitt Romneycares main problem.
Second was his expressed willingness to give Massachusetts's gays the right to force the boy scouts to accept gay men.
All his other deal killing actions as Governor pale next to those two.
3 posted on
12/01/2010 7:54:10 PM PST by
MrEdd
(Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.8)
To: neverdem
Much of the punditocracy is obsessed with Sarah Palin. So, Jennifer, why are you writing about Sarah Palin in your very first article for the Washington ComPost?
5 posted on
12/01/2010 7:55:39 PM PST by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius.)
To: neverdem
Good article. Thanks for posting.
6 posted on
12/01/2010 7:56:34 PM PST by
FTJM
To: neverdem
So you are a RomneyBOT, now?
Romney's problems INCLUDE RomneyCARE, RomneyDEATHpanels,
RomneyMarriage, Romney's destruction of the Mass. Constitution,
and on, and on, and on.
Backstabber and spoiler Mitt Romney is unelectable.
Gov. Palin is ineluctable.
![](http://i170.photobucket.com/albums/u274/failtefailte/Miscellaneous/EconomistMagazineNoRomorHuck.jpg)
![](http://cagle.com/working/080905/stantis.gif)
9 posted on
12/01/2010 7:58:05 PM PST by
Diogenesis
('Freedom is the light of all sentient beings.' - Optimus Prime)
To: neverdem
Indeed, more Republicans -- on the Hill and around the country -- are beginning to suspect that she might not run I really hope they're right. If she runs, she'll be a disaster for the party, even if she doesn't win the nomination.
To: neverdem
I’m sure “Jennifer Rubin” is another high-quality, objective “journalist” trained at the finest school of journalism and that her opinion and desires never find their way into her articles.
Snort.
To: neverdem
12 posted on
12/01/2010 7:59:50 PM PST by
Diogenesis
('Freedom is the light of all sentient beings.' - Optimus Prime)
To: neverdem
Palin’s status as frontrunner in the 2012 Republican nomination process is certainly not jeopardized by anything posted in the Washington Post.
They wish.
I actually liked Romney a lot for some time, but as events unfold, it is evident that he is a dud.
Would he make a better Administrator than Palin?
No doubt.
Is he one of us?
No chance.
14 posted on
12/01/2010 8:03:30 PM PST by
Radix
("..Democrats are holding a meeting today to decide whether to overturn the results of the election.")
To: neverdem
15 posted on
12/01/2010 8:03:30 PM PST by
Bernard Marx
(I donÂ’t trust the reasoning of anyone who writes then when they mean than.)
To: neverdem
Why Jennifer . . . I find your remarks controversial and opinionated (confrontational too).
17 posted on
12/01/2010 8:04:14 PM PST by
YHAOS
(you betcha!)
To: neverdem
Whatever you do, don’t google-image Jennifer Rubin with safesearch off. Some disturbing images return.
To: neverdem
This is not written filled with confidence that BamBamKennedy is a sure thing... so the left is left to influence peddle which potential GOP candidate they can ‘McCain’ as their candidate of choice.
To: neverdem
Palin’s (potential) success is likely to rise as she is continually pilloried by the press and other liberals. Republicans will circle around “our girl” and she will continue to thereby be vaulted by us to super candidate status -— which is either EXACTLY what they want ... or the OPPOSITE of what they want (cant really read them on this yet)
28 posted on
12/01/2010 8:14:04 PM PST by
Optimist
(I think I'm beginning to see a pattern here.)
To: Gay State Conservative
Didn’t MA have a veto proof majority in each house forcing their version of Obamacare on Romney? Didn’t he veto a number of its provisions initially?
30 posted on
12/01/2010 8:17:22 PM PST by
neverdem
(Xin loi minh oi)
To: neverdem
![](http://i262.photobucket.com/albums/ii96/justacineast/pidgeon-stanwyck.jpg)
"Alright you hired. Give your Sarah Palin article to write-up, and send in the next Sarah Palin writer applicant on your way out! I need more, more!"
32 posted on
12/01/2010 8:19:16 PM PST by
mrsmith
To: neverdem
So, which is it? Are they scared to death of her and trying to destroy her, or are they pushing her on us because they think she’ll lead to a “shelacking”? It can’t really be both, can it?
To: neverdem
His main problem is he’s from Massachusetts, which is a death knell to any candidate.
To: neverdem
53 posted on
12/01/2010 8:43:16 PM PST by
FrankR
(Don't let the bastards wear you down!)
To: neverdem
"...But conservatives suspect there's also some mischief-making afoot -- the desire by liberal-leaning members of the media and the White House to make Palin the symbol of the Republican Party, which they are convinced will translate into her presidential run, her nomination and a shellacking for the GOP at the polls in 2012..."AHHHH HAAAAA
HAAAAHAAAA
HAAAAHAAA!!!!!!!!!!!
(too funny!)
55 posted on
12/01/2010 8:44:42 PM PST by
rlmorel
("We treat terrorists with kid gloves, and our citizens with rubber gloves." Rush Limbaugh)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson