Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Food safety bill passes Senate, but dead in the water because … Dems can't read the Constitution
Hotair ^ | 12/01/2010 | Ed Morrissey

Posted on 12/01/2010 8:51:43 AM PST by SeekAndFind

Apparently, no one told Harry Reid to check Article I, Section 7 of the Constitution before passing S510, the food-safety bill that Democrats hailed as a major lame-duck session achievement earlier this week — and which ran afoul of their own party in the House. Section 107 of the bill raises taxes, and as any Constitutional scholar can attest — or anyone else who has actually read the document that Senators swore to uphold when taking office — only the House of Representatives has that power:

A food safety bill that has burned up precious days of the Senate’s lame-duck session appears headed back to the chamber because Democrats violated a constitutional provision requiring that tax provisions originate in the House.

By pre-empting the House’s tax-writing authority, Senate Democrats appear to have touched off a power struggle with members of their own party in the House. The Senate passed the bill Tuesday, sending it to the House, but House Democrats are expected to use a procedure known as “blue slipping” to block the bill, according to House and Senate GOP aides.

The debacle could prove to be a major embarrassment for Senate Democrats, who sought Tuesday to make the relatively unknown bill a major political issue by sending out numerous news releases trumpeting its passage.

Section 107 of the bill includes a set of fees that are classified as revenue raisers, which are technically taxes under the Constitution. According to a House GOP leadership aide, that section has ruffled the feathers of Ways and Means Committee Democrats, who are expected to use the blue slip process to block completion of the bill.

Now what? The House will either block the bill entirely or pass its own version of it. The latter option will mean that Reid will have to hold a vote to reopen debate on the bill, and will need unanimous consent to limit that debate. Otherwise, it could take the rest of the legislative calendar in the Senate to move the bill before the session ends and the bill has to be reintroduced. Even if the House cooperated, the bill could later be challenged in court as being procedurally deficient.

Reid can forget about unanimous consent. Roll Call notes that Tom Coburn won’t agree to it due to his strong opposition to the bill in any form. Meanwhile, the issue will continue to draw attention to Democrats’ continued expansion of the regulatory state while ignoring jobs and the budget.

Yesterday, Senate Democrats were crowing about this bill. Today, they’ll be eating crow.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: constitution; famineact; foodsafetybill; searchandfind; senate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: frogjerk

” Correct, but will the House do it? “

Exactly — The House passed their version of this bill almost a year-and-a-half ago ( with Republican - spit - support, if memory serves...)

The fools who want this aren’t gonna let a little thing like the Constitution, or even bruised egos, get in the way of this massive Government Intrusion/Power Grab.....


21 posted on 12/01/2010 9:35:45 AM PST by Uncle Ike (Rope is cheap, and there are lots of trees...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Picky, picky, picky.

(For the untrained, that’s sarcasm folks.)


22 posted on 12/01/2010 9:52:59 AM PST by savedbygrace (But God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

House al;ready passed their version some months back-—very far UNDER the radar.

Don’t know the bill number—does anyone here know the number for my records?


23 posted on 12/01/2010 11:21:16 AM PST by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Ike

and Monsanto up 2.5% in this morning’s “””

Soros just bought over 897,000 shares of Monsanto a very short time ago.


24 posted on 12/01/2010 11:24:36 AM PST by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The incompetence of these fools sometimes works to the peoples benefit.


25 posted on 12/02/2010 2:29:50 AM PST by RVN Airplane Driver ("To be born into freedom is an accident; to die in freedom is an obligation..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson